tachdelan.bsky.social
31 posts
8 followers
10 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
What are you on about? AOC is Puerto Rican. She's always been a US citizen.
comment in response to
post
You mean, the fact that an un-elected, unconfirmed oligarch without sufficient security clearance is given unlimited access to sensitive data about the US and its citizens?
Yeah, it is kinda wild that it's not a bigger story!
comment in response to
post
Here's a notion,
As long as the president is immune to lawsuits, the president is also barred from suing.
comment in response to
post
DEI is bad but Nepotism is good? 🤮
comment in response to
post
Also, threats of violence? Are you a terrorist by your own definition now?
My god, you're an ignorant cultist! Stay mad, though!
comment in response to
post
Stay mad, cultist!
comment in response to
post
"Won't tolerate your ignorant ass for one more second."
*Proceeds to write several replies in an unhinged rant.*
Stay mad, cultist!
comment in response to
post
I'm sure it's easy to feel big and strong while anonymous on the internet, so good for you!
I can defend myself well in several ways, so your little ranty threat means little to me.
Don't know if you've blocked me, and I honestly don't care. Stay mad, cultist!
comment in response to
post
Imagine not being able to differentiate between second and third person pronouns while calling someone else stupid.
True MAGA right there! 😂
comment in response to
post
Circular definitions as well? You're a special one, huh?
Keep up the insults, though! They're giving a nice view of your shortcomings and your character (or lack thereof).
Come back when you got more than circular arguments/definitions and weak-minded insults!
comment in response to
post
Terrorism isn't violence by itself. Nor is it defined as terrorism in small scale.
There are certain conditions that needs to be met for it to be correctly called terrorism. Shooting 1 person on the street CAN NOT be correctly called terrorism.
comment in response to
post
Your argument is weak as piss, that's why you pivot to personal attacks instead of addressing the argument itself.
Terrorism has a legal definition. I showed you the definition. It negates your ignorant argument while defending mine.
Your insults are of no interest to me.
comment in response to
post
It's also very consistently MAGA of you to ignore the legal definition of terrorism I shared and just pivot to straight up insults.
comment in response to
post
Of course, I understand when you're communicating like an adult and not a toddler.
It's funny how you're such a snowflake about being called out on it, though!
Also, do try to keep track of who you're referring to.
THEY lost, YOU'RE stupid?
They lost because we're stupid? Oh, the irony! 🤣
comment in response to
post
As opposed to you who are either too damned lazy to check your own writing or too ignorant to correct the mistake.
I'm not here to interpret your faulty writing.
It's not like it's just one word that's wrong either, so it's anyone's guess as to the intended meaning.
Why would I join your table?
comment in response to
post
What the shit is this English, dude? Illiterate, ignorant BS...
comment in response to
post
See, this is why Cospatriots following the Mango Mussolini is ridiculed!
Terrorism is when you murder someone by shooting them in the back?
Not according to 18 USC Ch. 113B: TERRORISM
comment in response to
post
Look up the legal definition of terrorism in the US and you'll perhaps understand.
I mean, if they can charge a dude for killing a CEO with terrorism, the bar ain't that low!
comment in response to
post
You realize that what the J6'ers did could be called terrorism, right?
By the legal definition of terrorism, they could all be charged, tried and sentenced to decades in prison.
Those people are the ones you're defending.
You're the one confused here, silly!
comment in response to
post
You'll find intelligent people in the media, speaking truth and making sense.
It's just nowhere near as much as the opposite.
The 4th estate has joined what they were supposed to keep in check and hold to account.
comment in response to
post
For all the other faults, Seneca has a point about the healthcare.
Dems should really rally on the subject of dismantling the rampant healthcare gouging by healthcare insurers.
USE DJT's words in your fight too, perhaps then you'll get somewhere!
comment in response to
post
You mean the last 4 years of obstructionism by the GOP? Where they REFUSED to partake in core democratic functions of the ELECTED government to "stick it to the Dems", even though it hurt the general public?
A perfect example is the Disaster Relief Fund that the GOP blocked funding for during Helena
comment in response to
post
So open-minded that you chose to block over trying to articulate arguments other than "I'm older so I know better than you".
SMDH.
comment in response to
post
Again with the dismissive and holier-than-thou attitude. Just because you're older doesn't automatically make you wiser or more knowledgeable.
THAT is the failed thinking of GenX/Boomers, as is was with those before them. Minds becoming less agile is why the eldest should not rule.
comment in response to
post
There it is... the dismissive stance of someone unable to accept the viewpoint of others.
How come all the "truth-something" people are the least open to opposing viewpoints?
comment in response to
post
That's not true, according to you...
This is the issue here. You've now assumed things about me several times without knowing anything about me, disregarding my experiences of 40+ years as if your 20 or so more years invalidate my experiences.
It sounds like you're not accepting the truth here.
comment in response to
post
How "adult" of you to assume that my parents aren't Boomers or GenX.
And while those generations fought for civil rights, they are the ones opposing the same rights for LGBTQ+, trying to take away women's rights, etc. at this junction in time.
So please don't tell me how millennials->now failed.
comment in response to
post
Not trying to disqualify your adulthood in any way, but my experience has shown that people 50+ often have less of a clue about reality than those 30-.
There's just too many false truths ingrained in the Gen X and Baby boomer generations that reject new information that goes counter to their "fact"
comment in response to
post
The irony of people whining about DEI hires...