techdisaster.bsky.social
211 posts
259 followers
218 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The DNC must hate the idea of an actual liberal candidate winning the primary.
comment in response to
post
"Until they change their stated goal" what the hell does that even mean? They can keep secret goals, just can't keep the stated one?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
It was our side's version of "the Kracken will be released any day now!" as proof of election fraud in 2020, even though they never did have evidence, but we never had the promised "He's just dotting all the Is and crossing the Ts, gotta be an airtight case! Justice is slow and methodical. "
comment in response to
post
They are supposed to be the only ones to approve a lot of things that have happened...
comment in response to
post
The face of someone with empathy realizing who they're with, perhaps?
comment in response to
post
I stopped following Muellershewrote or whatever that account is because they deflected all blame on the man.
comment in response to
post
They didn't even try as hard to lie this time. Why bother when they can come out and say it?
comment in response to
post
Empathy and intelligence are what GOP voters will never possess.
comment in response to
post
Not really. But the GOP keeps pulling the football away while Charlie Brown tries to kick it.
comment in response to
post
And? 3 months ago there were enough reasons to submit articles of impeachment.
comment in response to
post
Laws aren't protecting us now or being followed, so maybe stop looking for reasons to blame Democrats...
comment in response to
post
In the last section they cover it, most emphasis seems to be on humans getting sick.
vcahospitals.com/know-your-pe...
comment in response to
post
It's crucial to them to ignore the evidence of what we can see and hear, like in that one book.
comment in response to
post
“When you ran out the healthy arms — you ran out of really healthy — they had great arms, but they ran out. It’s called sports. It’s called baseball in particular. And pitchers, I guess you could say, and really particular.”
comment in response to
post
Dude 100% looks like he was insurrectioning before this.
comment in response to
post
100%. We will never get real, significant change and away from just two parties if we always need to vote against the worst of two choices.
comment in response to
post
It really is that reason, ultimately. There were probably weak articles to pretend they're more center or left than they really are.
comment in response to
post
It's like people stopped by the police having to maintain more self control in the face of a power tripping cop lest they end up shot.
comment in response to
post
Never-ending appeasement even when there's a case to stay and fight.
comment in response to
post
Is that his signing bonus?
comment in response to
post
Murdered for wanting to protect innocents by pushing for red flag laws, that may have kept firearms out of their killer's reach.
comment in response to
post
I'd replace "foreclosure" with civil forfeiture but true.
comment in response to
post
Vote for the lesser of two evils, otherwise by not voting can let the worst one win. We need weighted/ranked voting in federal elections.
comment in response to
post
Everyone else can rightfully point out what BS this all is, so I'm gonna ask about that mustache.
comment in response to
post
I tried, but my PCP thought it was not necessary to worry about future access to vaccines.
comment in response to
post
"This means that they will accompany ICE agents on raids, officials have said."
I'm sorry, they're gonna do WHAT?
comment in response to
post
For him personally, sure...
comment in response to
post
Isn't OPM the ones directing agencies to reorganize and do the RIF though? Also its disheartening to see how many agencies seem to be racing to do this to their employees.
comment in response to
post
Man, you guys get weighted voting there?
comment in response to
post
Absolutely right, if everyone had Healthcare, the volume of people needing to be seen at the ER would drop drastically!
comment in response to
post
It's clear they shouldn't be making traffic stops or even know how, but the drivers sure seem to have had practice using their vehicles to trap another vehicle.
comment in response to
post
Looked pretty damn well choreographed to me, designed to trap the car between them. Guessing the drivers had training even if the rest of the stop appeared like their first time, like traffic stops were new to them, which is probably the case.
comment in response to
post
They would have charged the people they detained if they'd hit them, probably.
comment in response to
post
Would it matter at this point if the truth came out? Who would be left to kick them all out?
comment in response to
post
A photographer should talk to someone who has a car they take to a track or offload in.
comment in response to
post
Android sometimes autocorrects to blatantly wrong letters for me, suggestions that aren't even words.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, lots of people seem to be rolling with this as if it says somewhere "thanks but no thanks, we have it under control." It literally states they are prepared to escalate.
comment in response to
post
This. People will say judges but any ruling is a suggestion without someone to enforce it.
comment in response to
post
You mean "Quirk" or this guy?
comment in response to
post
...do you not?
comment in response to
post
Pretty sure the relatives put the gold coin under the deceased's tongue, not the ghost paying their fare by doing it to the ferryman. The dude probably has pockets.
Source: I'm banned from taking the ferry.
comment in response to
post
They milked a bull.
comment in response to
post
The "Death Panels" were all projection and now they're getting ready to roll them out. Maybe they can have a Hinger Games situation where one person gets life saving treatment if they win.
comment in response to
post
TBF enough homes with those would probably make it harder for pilots to see, like bright sun in the snow.
comment in response to
post
I mean this isn't ideal but I'm sure they can afford it, maybe the CEO doesn't need a new yacht this year.
comment in response to
post
Only real ones will get this.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, Ok. Realistically we unfortunately have to actively vote against a candidate here. If we had weighted or ranked voting in federal elections then we could pick a better candidate, otherwise we need to vote against someone rather than for someone.