th8rgoddess.bsky.social
Smile! It confuses people!
108 posts
91 followers
103 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
...So please, don't fall for people trying to sell you dangerous supplements without warnings everywhere and tell as many people as you can. I don't think that I'm being hyperbolic when I say we're looking at a potential public health crisis that no one is talking about...
comment in response to
post
..There is no warning on their website or ads. I've added proof that IQ Bar (which is terrifyingly available at major retailers), Rasa, Everyday Dose, and the influencers shilling for them do not give a shit about your health...
comment in response to
post
...These mushroom's drug interactions can kill people and the companies don't care. When challenged they say, "We always recommend people talk to their doctors before starting a new supplement." But they don't. Their advertising treats these mushrooms like a foodstuff and not a supplement...
comment in response to
post
..And that's just the Lion's mane. I know some of the other mushrooms, like chaga, have negative drig interactions and other problems. But I can only focus on one at a time...
comment in response to
post
...While lion's mane is said to help prevent stomach ulcers its interaction with anticoagulants can cause stomach ulcers, severe brusing, and a serious bleeding even if you get cut...
comment in response to
post
..As a type 1 diabetic I can tell you that low blood sugar can cause you to feel aweful, black out, have seizures and (though I haven't experienced this one) your death...
comment in response to
post
...While it's usually fine if you consume lion's mane occasionally, these companies encourage you to consume them daily, or more often. It's the build up of the ingredient and higher dose you can get that makes it more dangerous. Like with type 2 diabetes meds it can cause sudden low blood sugar..
comment in response to
post
But with American Capitalism he'll get corporate welfare.
comment in response to
post
First of all, I hope he's okay. Second, I think this is a clear sign it's time to retire.
comment in response to
post
The Corey Booker that was originally elected would be ashamed with what he has become.
comment in response to
post
The Corey Booker that was originally elected would be ashamed with what he has become.
comment in response to
post
The Corey Booker that was originally elected would be ashamed with what he has become.
comment in response to
post
Jersey doesn't want him either. PA should keep it's trash to its self.
comment in response to
post
I'm in NJ. Have been my whole life except for college and an internship. It's still true. Every state apparently needs to have a BS argument that can be easily solved with an infinitesimal bit of logic.
comment in response to
post
While their neighbors are asking, "Why me?" they're asking, "Why not me?"
That's a special kind of survivors guilt right there.
comment in response to
post
Trauma like that doesn't give a shit about your socioeconomic class and we need to show compassion for everyone going through it even though they will be financially fine and, probably, the first to rebuild.
comment in response to
post
They still left their house knowing they might never come back or fled an already burning building. They still watched the news not knowing what happened to their home, or watched it burn on live TV.
comment in response to
post
That color looks fantastic on you and you look so poised and happy.
comment in response to
post
As long as people know what you're talking about the two are linguistically interchangeable.
comment in response to
post
If you've ever called invisible tape Scotch Tape or your refrigerator a Fridge you know this is a BS argument. In the US language we often refer to an item, like pork roll, by the first/most famous/widest used brand name, like Taylor Ham.
comment in response to
post
You're clearly forgetting that NJ has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Which is why they haven't been shot at. But notice how whoever is doing this is staying to the more populated shore side counties? 'Cause they probably know that the more urban, PA adjacent ones have hunting rifles
comment in response to
post
I've been equally amused & annoyed by the people who are shocked that no one has shot at them. Clearly they don't know about NJ's gun laws.
But notice how whoever is doing this has avoided us PA adjacent counties? They know we have hunting rifles
comment in response to
post
Did they ever stop?
comment in response to
post
Rules have metrics for letter and spirit of by which you can judge people. We need to not be afraid of judging people by the spirit of the rule.
comment in response to
post
Second, this is NJ not TX. The eastern part if the state doesn't have many guns, but the western has a fair amount of hunting weapons. I'll be amused if the drones come towards the western part or gun nuts decide to FAFO with NJ's gun laws.
comment in response to
post
First of all, the government probably knows because those who would know aren't saying anything. It's probably Air Force b/c of the bases in NJ & MD. But the genius that thought to do testing over one of the most populated areas in the US didn't think to come up with CYA talking points.
comment in response to
post
I say Air Force because of the bases in NJ & MD where they've been seen, the fed government isn't worrying and the military is really the only organization that can keep a secret like this.
comment in response to
post
I think you're giving Musk too much credit. I don't think the man is smart enough to think up the plan or competent enough to facilitate the building.
comment in response to
post
People aren't joyful about the death of a man. We don't know him enough where there's anything that would endear him to us.
We're joyful about the death of what has become a symbol of corporate greed & the knowledge that CEOs are afraid they may face repercussions for the suffering they profit from
comment in response to
post
As long as they're not scared enough to lash out.
comment in response to
post
... those that didn't see Musk's attempts to affect the election, and those with their mind made up and the number of people he could affect drops significantly.
comment in response to
post
Twitter had 50.5 million active monthly users at the same time. Now take out people under 18 and who otherwise can't vote, people who aren't registered to vote, Republicans, Independents and 3rd party voters that would never vote Democrat, diehard Harris voters, ...
comment in response to
post
As I've inferred before, the people working on the Harris campaign are bad at their jobs. This is just one poll that says she was winning at that time.
www.msn.com/en-us/news/p...
comment in response to
post
Again, Musk's efforts to dissuade voters did have some effect. But it couldn't have been big enough to be the soul reason Harris lost. First, because passionate, excited voters who believe in a candidate can't be dissuaded. Second, because big cluster fucks never have one cause
comment in response to
post
Your thoughts on Musk being effective enough to dissuade 10M+ voters is supposition. The history of how the Harris, Clinton and Warren campaigns lost is documented history with a clear cause and effect that you can go back and check it happen in real time through news coverage.