Profile avatar
that-trevor.bsky.social
Recovering attorney, cook, Regtech enthusiast and founder, fraud fighter, food lover, friend
33 posts 47 followers 72 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter

That’s not quite right. Due process means the govt must take certain steps to deprive you of certain rights (liberties). The outcomes are set forth in statutes. While not always applicable (see: arrest), it is for permanent deprivations, so Rep Spartz is clearly wrong.

Actually, if DEI is driven for many based superficial aesthetics (think of company photos), Trump is driven at base by aesthetics: beyond loyalty it’s people who look like came from 1950s central casting

Oh great… Trump’s tariffs and vacillations likely lead to lower consumption in a time of persistently inflation, meaning we’re facing the real possibility of stagflation (when joblessness/recession combines with high prices for a 70s reunion tour). Problem with managing 1/3

Anti: Vaxx Pro: Child Sacrifice

Cast: Orban, Trump Script: …

“Little Marco”

Antivaxxers who target infant and children’s vaccines sacrifice children for their own beliefs.* Who said child sacrifice isn’t making a resurgence? (*it’s in the numbers. Numeracy is your friend.)

So, the {insert colorful descriptor} dude whose businesses and wealth derive from (and depend on) government spending and subsidies, pushes to shut down the government over overspending… (math is hard)

“Innocent until proven guilty” is incorrect. State-sanctioned deprivation of liberty requires due process—public opprobrium does not. I await the Smith Report.