victorx5y.bsky.social
91 posts
35 followers
9 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
True. Republicans are evil. Democrats are incompetent. Happy?
comment in response to
post
It is not a buyout. Read it. You are working till the last day.
comment in response to
post
I sure know I have had the TB vaccine.
comment in response to
post
Oh! Burn!
comment in response to
post
There is no energy emergency. So…
comment in response to
post
He’s going to round them up and ship them out and then let them sue from wherever they end up. Remember, he’s been given a free hand by the Supreme Court.
comment in response to
post
So only the obnoxious rich will buy.
comment in response to
post
Could?
comment in response to
post
I almost took out a hit out on Nic after being forced to watch Ghost Rider.
comment in response to
post
You do know he was alive when police arrived? Right? I mean, you know the facts? Right?
comment in response to
post
You got mad. That’s kind of funny.
comment in response to
post
Turns out Neely was alive when the police arrived, so your narrative is wrong.
comment in response to
post
If he meant to kill him, why was he alive when police arrived?
comment in response to
post
You are aware Neely was alive when police arrived and they administered NARCAN?
comment in response to
post
How about measuring truth?
comment in response to
post
You know that how? Interestingly, had he shot and killed him, after he had been threatened by a crazy man, with no ability to flee, he’d have also been acquitted.
comment in response to
post
No idea why you would say that he deserved to die. It was inevitable he would die or kill someone, from his escalating behavior, but he needed to be institutionalized and treated, not killed. It was a failure on multiple levels.
comment in response to
post
People like him wear out family with their bs. Trust me, I know. Didn’t deserve to die, but he was a bad dude. Not the saint the brainwashed turned him into.
comment in response to
post
That’s your world view. You do you. No one else will.
comment in response to
post
Idiot? Well you win with that quip, Einstein. You’re actually totally wrong. Look it up. It easy.
I am neither left or a lunatic. You appear to be, however, with your rant. I do not support open borders, not that that was on topic. Seriously, if you’re going to go ballistic, at least be right.
comment in response to
post
Be very carful with what you say on socials. Not trying to be snarky, but your one post I’d delete.
comment in response to
post
January 6th? I 100% agree with you.
comment in response to
post
That is actually the definition of assault. You’re confusing that with battery.
comment in response to
post
I hope you’re trying to be funny.
comment in response to
post
Are we sure that’s a Mug shot?
comment in response to
post
Three good choices.
comment in response to
post
Hmmm. Perhaps there is a defense there.
comment in response to
post
Rosa Parks? Who thinks Rosa Parks wasn’t a brave woman who made a historical difference? 😕
comment in response to
post
His speaking was threatening to kill everyone. Not protected speak.
comment in response to
post
Apparently, and I needed to ask the ghost of RBG, but there is this thing called self defense when someone tells you they’re going to kill you.
comment in response to
post
Now that would be libel.
comment in response to
post
Perhaps, but why would he continue to choke someone he knew to be dead?
comment in response to
post
Hate to agree with Ramadwanydingdong, but there you have it.
comment in response to
post
That would be libel.
comment in response to
post
So what? That’s the kind of stuff that helped get Trump elected.
comment in response to
post
Self defense is legal.
comment in response to
post
Black people do not kill a lot of white people.
comment in response to
post
Apparently the jury found otherwise.
comment in response to
post
Is that true? If he knew he could kill him in seconds, as some say, why would he continue to hold a man he knew to be dead?
comment in response to
post
The jury disagreed. Whom to trust? You or the jury. Pondering.
comment in response to
post
Apparently several people on the train felt threatened enough to intervene.
comment in response to
post
Jury after hearing all the evidence, found him not guilty.
comment in response to
post
Tell that to the dead people. The jury disagreed. You are doubling down on a losing argument. Many people on that train believed they were at serious risk. Several also intervened.
Was this sad event? Yes. But, if you threaten to kill someone they may defend themselves. That’s the only story.
comment in response to
post
Which now becomes libel.
comment in response to
post
So, clearly when someone on a train says they’re going to murder everyone, a reasonable person may believe they were at real risk. Hmmm.
This is a sad case, but clearly the jury found your supposition to be to wrong.
comment in response to
post
See when you attack people and not the message, that makes you a bad person. I never did that. Do better.
comment in response to
post
I have a great example. lol.
comment in response to
post
Never once claimed to know all the facts. That would make you a liar.
comment in response to
post
I’m not posting things that are clearly wrong. And you appear to just be a troll.