wdust00.bsky.social
They were never friends. They were always willing to throw people under the bus.
178 posts
45 followers
100 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
to disacknowledge and derecognize differences and disparate histories. Diversity was just too INCONVENIENT. They, along with aspiring-to-be-white-adjacent POC, access full Constitutional rights with MONEY. (2/2)
comment in response to
post
Bondi will persecute - I mean, prosecute - everyone who disagrees with the administration.
comment in response to
post
Ben Shapiro couldn't hack it in actual law practice so he started a "consultancy" firm.
comment in response to
post
Ha, even Capital One is claiming a piece of immunity upon the transition to an immune president.
comment in response to
post
I didn't know that most of South Jersey had been majority white. Did Trump make inroads with the Latinos and South Asians who moved in?
comment in response to
post
Curious, what do you think turned them against Dems?
comment in response to
post
Isn't journalisming going to become criminal under Bondi?
comment in response to
post
WaPo is totally f*cked.
comment in response to
post
Do it, Democrats. When have Republicans done anything good for the people of Maine?
comment in response to
post
Sorry, do you mean that adding charges for insurrection would have DQ'ed him from the presidency in 2024, or would DQ him in the future if convicted?
DOJ is so faithful to precedent while the conservative judiciary lays waste to it - both to our nation's detriment.
comment in response to
post
I'm sure we have some choice words for him, borrowed from Shakespeare.
comment in response to
post
Well, thanks. On Jan 14.
comment in response to
post
We all know the f'ing GOP will fall in line and confirm this piece of garbage Hegseth.
comment in response to
post
That could be true, too. But inviting the U.S. to wave $$$ in their faces in exchange for resource extraction might be opening a dangerous door, with detrimental effects on Greenland's environment in an already rapidly warming climate. Though I cannot speak for what Greenland needs or wants!
comment in response to
post
All New Yorkers can carry firearms in self-defense now, right?
comment in response to
post
Who the hell is buying shares of Trump Social? Emirati oil barons?
comment in response to
post
Stand strong, Greenland. Don't let Trump exploit your nation.
comment in response to
post
Yes. And most of the time, no one will be able to stop them.
comment in response to
post
I use F.B. Purity on my facebook page - it filters out ads and gives the user greater control over the interface. But Zuck's actions are so unforgivable that it's probably time to end that account.
comment in response to
post
That "hateful conduct" exception allowing gender slurs related to break-ups was disturbing. How many people are having relationship troubles (or lack of relationships) at meta? Is Zuck's marriage to Priscilla on the rocks?
comment in response to
post
Is Threads becoming the new 4chan?
comment in response to
post
Where does this case go from here?
comment in response to
post
WHAT THE F. He's saying, let's allow persecution queer people so more people will support them???
Because HE has the means to protect himself from it, and HE doesn't give a sh!t about anyone else.
comment in response to
post
They are "friends" to him as much as he is to them.
comment in response to
post
That sentence can be read in many ways. We are indeed patriarchy-stupid.
comment in response to
post
She's an ELO fan, too?!
comment in response to
post
These debacles were the Bushes' doing.
comment in response to
post
Oh, my god. The @nytimes.com is moronic. Their viewership must still write in crayon.
comment in response to
post
^^^^^ They conveniently leave out that part. He joined the Nat Soc party as a means to a perverted fascist end. Like Trump has done with the Republican Party.
comment in response to
post
On Jan. 20:
CONVICTED FELON TAKES OFFICE
Democrats pledge bipartisanship
comment in response to
post
All of the presidents who took the office via shady means have turned out to be terrible presidents. They stretched the law getting in, and then once in office they broke it beyond recognition.
comment in response to
post
Aside from independent redistricting, there is no remedy for this, is there?
comment in response to
post
"Yeah, he can be sentenced, he'll still be King."
comment in response to
post
Argh. It should not take news media to remind people that CA is not on fire because BIPOC/LGBTQ+ people are in leadership positions.
comment in response to
post
Irredeemable.
comment in response to
post
The party in power wouldn't jeopardize their grip on power (well, maybe if they were Dems they would). Seems like partisan makeup of districts would have to flip overnight for the legislature to flip. How could that ever happen?
comment in response to
post
Perhaps red-state gerrymandering has made it perilous for Dems to mount a unified resistance like Mitch and his gang did against Obama and freeze out Rump. I wish they would, though. Mitch showed that minority parties can still flex their power.
comment in response to
post
Rather than restoring the integrity of the rules, the goal for many people then becomes... to (legally or illegally) become a rich person so they can successfully break the rules, too.
comment in response to
post
For that to be effective, the audience has to *care* about rules. As we've seen, rich people breaking the rules has resulted in zero (or positive!) consequences. Courts have no enforcement mechanism. As long as people see that rule-breakers succeed, why would they think rules are in our interests?
comment in response to
post
Republicans: Democrats broke the rules!
Democrats: Oh, gosh, we're so sorry, we will take action to remedy this egregious violation and remove the offending individuals right away and this shall never happen again!
comment in response to
post
Rump has never been treated by any level of government (or the mainstream media) as that which he is: the single greatest threat to the U.S.'s national and domestic security. If he had, all traces of him would have been gone by now.
comment in response to
post
The more Zuck talks, the more he looks like a fool. As we grow older, we become more ourselves. He'll always be the overcompensating nerd-geek.
comment in response to
post
That's exactly what those Americans who voted for him are. If not at this moment to you, then at other times to other people in their lives.
comment in response to
post
That is just an insane picture. Greenlanders wanting to make America "great" again.
comment in response to
post
Plastic-gold-chain guy Zuck is astoundingly un-self-aware.
comment in response to
post
Does "uninsurable" in this context mean unprofitable or actually financially impossible for the company to cover?
comment in response to
post
Which U.S. media will cover the story that Rump's people bribed disadvantaged people to play supporters in Greenland? Greenland has NO F-ING REASON to support U.S. takeover of their nation. @washingtonpost.com @nytimes.com @wsj.com @bloomberg.com @nbcnews.com @cbsnewsconfirmed.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Can Biden and the DOJ do something with teeth before Jan 20? Please? We're being failed by the people we trusted.
comment in response to
post
Except this natural disaster is happening in CA and right-wingers are really into that.