wernerflynn123.bsky.social
120 posts
11 followers
4 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
You have classy friends. Cum malis, malus.
comment in response to
post
You’re a sycophant
comment in response to
post
What evidence do you have to corroborate your claims? You offer none.
comment in response to
post
Such a silly video. Mind candy with a short shelf life.
comment in response to
post
Campaign pro?
comment in response to
post
QED
comment in response to
post
Ur the online embodiment of the much beloved “peanut gallery”. What r u doing here, except tiring out?
comment in response to
post
You’re totally right, bruh
comment in response to
post
Wait
Legislative politics are “choreographed”?!
Nooooooooooo
You're brilliant
comment in response to
post
U were too busy having ur beard trimmed and ur balls tugged
comment in response to
post
Let's start with basics. Kindly define "fascism".
comment in response to
post
“U no make sense” is also “immediately understandable”.
comment in response to
post
“I did not ever” is horrible syntax.
comment in response to
post
Why are you such an opponent of democracy?
comment in response to
post
The first amendment’s reference to “the press” is NOT a reference to an “occupation”. How are you this ignorant and arrogant?
comment in response to
post
The fact that he “has a history of making false statements to smear opponents” merely points to a pattern of fabrication and gives cause to doubt him and to check his source(s). All you did was dismiss him. What’s his source?
comment in response to
post
But is Stone right or wrong? That seems to be something critical that you sidestepped.
comment in response to
post
Why?
comment in response to
post
The origin of federal gun control is not a state of California law passed in 1967. It began with the 1934 NFA. The 1968 federal GCA was not modeled on California’s law.
comment in response to
post
interesting. So, 1967 is before 1934?
comment in response to
post
If he lays out in the sun, will he start to smell of bacon?
comment in response to
post
Ask her if I could share her flask.
comment in response to
post
It’s clear that Chris Cuomo was growing tired of you. Care to wager when you’ll next be on his show?
comment in response to
post
Wrong. The first two major gun control bills were the NFA in 1934 and the GCA in 68. Reagan pushed for superfluous gun legislation at the state level but that was merely following a national trend. Lay down the ideological blinders.
comment in response to
post
Actually, that’s not true.
comment in response to
post
Once you condemn the Obama admin’s use of the espionage act to target whistleblowers and journalists, then I might listen to your professed outrage.
comment in response to
post
Because you’re a whiny little bitch.
comment in response to
post
The DNC vice chair, affectionately known as Bullets, is a little Nazzzzzeeeeeee.
comment in response to
post
He didn’t fire all of them.
comment in response to
post
Obviously Pothole Pete kept us all safe. How did he do it? Must’ve been that McKinsey & Co fairy dust.
comment in response to
post
Driving test?
comment in response to
post
And a Biden DOJ thing vis-a-vis Trump. I very much liked your “Gulag” book. Keep to Stalinist Russia and abstain from inane political commentary, Anne. You’re old, so I assume you’re concerned about your legacy. This isn’t helping it. Love, a wilted fan
comment in response to
post
Mine is “SlutMonkey69”. Password protected. I bet you can’t guess the password. 🤭
comment in response to
post
Yes, because you’re a proud inhabitant of this universe? . . .
comment in response to
post
So, literally not a single other immigrant in the ENTIRE country wants to destroy the country? Such a silly post. Also, that’s a pretty OG picture of the evil, dastardly dude.
comment in response to
post
Is this where women get together and share recipes and exchange Tupperware? What fun!
comment in response to
post
I can understand. You’re fighting so valiantly for the cause of democracy.
comment in response to
post
She claimed to support one. She claimed many things.
comment in response to
post
What exactly is illegal?
comment in response to
post
I started your video but immediately took issue with two rather alarming errors: first, you’re relying on Wikipedia; and second, you mispronounce the word “detat”. And, I’m merely a minute into the video . . .
comment in response to
post
Relax there, you wild racist, you.
comment in response to
post
What’s the literacy rate of the Chicago Public School system? What about Newark? Shall I continue?
comment in response to
post
Maybe they think you guys don’t have large enough audiences or sufficient “influence” as to warrant a “reach out”?
comment in response to
post
What book would you recommend that they read?
comment in response to
post
Do you donate the proceeds to charity or do you use them to subsidize your lifestyle? I’d hate to think that this is all a sale’s pitch.
comment in response to
post
Don’t worry! He’ll turn against Fox, accusing it of terrible sins, as per usual.
comment in response to
post
How exactly are you “under attack”? A proper, substantive answer will involve particular examples and their direct impact on you. Otherwise, you’re delusional or intentionally and unjustifiably dramatic.
comment in response to
post
“a ton”?! That many? Geez. Approximately how many?
comment in response to
post
Do you have a reputable source that doesn’t involve an online article or video citing anonymous sources?
comment in response to
post