Profile avatar
zigzaggin.bsky.social
Just a work-at-home dad and husband trying to maintain some contact with the world outside.
125 posts 91 followers 223 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
They all had 2 shots at them.
comment in response to post
is it bad that i'm hanging my hopes on us being fucked so fast and hard that the backlash avoids longer term fucking
comment in response to post
Yeah, this is the horrible thought I cling to often while fully acknowledging it's horribleness.
comment in response to post
The Legend of Lizzie Borden on TV at midnight. My older stepsister convinced me to stay up and watch with her. Then she fell asleep. I was scared yet very interested in the story. Still get shivers thinking of it.
comment in response to post
When I was growing up the big thing was overpopulation. Guess we solved that?
comment in response to post
Amazing.
comment in response to post
I'm thinking Dr. Phil's endorsement changed zero votes, nor his rescinding of it.
comment in response to post
My wife and I thought the same thing, but we're in the don't really get it crowd. We knew this. We felt the lack.
comment in response to post
I really miss the waiting until sometime in the late afternoon to turn them back. I want that hour when I can notice it. I will re-enact the old ritual with the 3 I will need to set back.
comment in response to post
This straight white mid-fifties dude was hoping to hear "Goodluck, Babe" but I loved the new song! Turned to my wife of 26 years and said "I'm really glad I already have you because I probably couldn't compete with that."
comment in response to post
Where are all the articles demanding that Trump govern from the center? Or from any consistent political position whatsoever that isn't rooted in his own interest and his alone?
comment in response to post
They aren't skeptics. They are denialists. They aren't really questioning the results, they just want to be able to change them to reflect the result they want.
comment in response to post
Let me know if they are still saying this tomorrow after the nightly shills spew their spins and that becomes tomorrow's story.
comment in response to post
So, like Mitch McConnell, he is hoping the Democrats take care of Trump on their own so he can swoop in afterwards and take advantage. That didn't work for McConnell. Cowards. Unprincipled cowards.
comment in response to post
I'll take it. I've had Kiss' Hard Luck Woman stuck in my head for days.
comment in response to post
But gerrymandering the legislature is what allows the shenanigans.
comment in response to post
This Panthers fan is much more acquainted with this sensation.
comment in response to post
But we have learned, especially since Jan 6, that there just aren't that many "sensible" Republicans. Otherwise this wouldn't even be an issue anymore.
comment in response to post
I like Threads. I like BlueSky. Both seem to be as good as the people you follow. I also use Mastodon, but I haven't found a big enough interesting group to follow there. I don't care about engagement or followers. I just want entertaining content when I open my phone as a distraction.
comment in response to post
Pretty sure you can find plenty of voters in these comments who don't believe the NY Times even attempts to rise above partisanship. The Fox News of print media.
comment in response to post
Yeah, unlike the spectacle created by Trump, the job of being president is not usually conducted in front of TV cameras for show. It's actual work. Biden has done the job.
comment in response to post
My daughter will get to cast her first ballot while voting for a woman for president.
comment in response to post
Mastodon and Threads. Maybe IG but I don't open it very often.
comment in response to post
You can only lie about your opponent like they do, not state facts!
comment in response to post
We could regulate online privacy in general, but we aren't. Congress is targeting a particular company with a particular and problematic hammer.
comment in response to post
The grounds for the ban are relevant and arguments about the constitutionality of those grounds are legitimate. It's important too and like all constitutional arguments, the specifics of a particular situation don't negate the supposedly general application of those arguments.
comment in response to post
My issue is that whatever the threat of TikTok is is not limited to TikTok and going after TikTok specifically raises all sorts of issues that are troubling on other grounds. China does not need TikTok to do what they say China is using TikTok to do. Its either misunderstanding or misdirection.