Profile avatar
beat-army.bsky.social
Retired 🐊 ⚓️. Advocating for disabled vets and assisting separating ADSMs. Public health scientist, PhD microbiology and MPH, dismayed by denier ascendency. Facts matter. Twitter: @Beat_Army. I’m still there. Split time between AR and UT. 🇺🇸 Democrat.
596 posts 3,269 followers 2,620 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Yes, we need more leaders untethered to the major parties. Men & women of integrity & commitment to public service. The politics of evisceration pushes the factions further apart, demanding we join one over the other. Most of us reject that paradigm, wanting to address problems that really exist.
comment in response to post
Our leaders in the earliest days of our Republic feared political parties and devolution of society into factions. Of course, it didn’t take long for parties to form and dominate national politics. Their fears about factions have been fully realized. More parties is not the answer.
comment in response to post
In grand Arkansas style!
comment in response to post
He tried this with military personnel assigned to WHMO in his 1st term and his WH Counsel wrote an opinion advising it would be unlawful. Any ADSM who signs such an oath would be subject to disciplinary action under the UCMJ for carrying out an unlawful order. We are obligated to refuse the order.
comment in response to post
Yeah, but *mom* and *dad* have hit a rough patch, may be getting divorced, *Daddy Elmo* has the money to give them, so the *kids* are flocking to him. Broken homes can often be messy.
comment in response to post
Oh honey. You already have so much to apologize for, being white didn't even make the list.
comment in response to post
I trust science to keep me strong and healthy for as long as possible. If there is an *afterlife* and *heaven/hell,* then I trust my deeds during this time on earth, and not the act of sitting in a pew 1-hour/week, will sort me appropriately upon my death. I’m not a “we” in search of the answer.
comment in response to post
I grew up in the Catholic Church, read their book cover to cover more than once. I left the Church long ago, but live a more *christian* life than most modern-day US Christians. We donate time, labor and money to help vulnerable populations and discriminate against nobody.
comment in response to post
We get mired in tax rates & ignore deductions & exemptions that, irrespective of *marginal* tax rates, maintain the *effective* rates for wealthy individuals & corporations at indefensibly low levels. The *regressive* tax code needs overhauling to eliminate welfare to the rich & enslavement of us.
comment in response to post
I had the same reaction last month.
comment in response to post
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
comment in response to post
Im not sure I’m reading either “may I” or “please” in that stare.
comment in response to post
The opening of Jackson’s dissent:
comment in response to post
We had field-expedient fixes for weapons regardless of rules to the contrary. We’d rather live to face a court martial. In reality, no repairs were ever challenged.
comment in response to post
The previous Republican POTUS before Mr. Trump recognized the threat and directed HHS to lead the nation in preparing for avian influenza. Scientific illiteracy and anti-science rhetoric is ascending. It’s a national suicide pact. georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/homeland/pan...
comment in response to post
Every operational plan we worked on included vulnerabilities we could exploit. Mr. Trump’s are obvious, very easily exploited, and he falls for it every time. Coupled with his aversion to ever admitting a mistake just amplifies the risk to our national security and system of governance.
comment in response to post
Here’ s the NAS report on its review of the revised monograph (the 2nd review). This report by NTP was never successful in peer review. Yes, at high levels, fluoride is a neurotoxin; however, it has been found both safe and effective as municipal water additive. ntp.niehs.nih.gov/sites/defaul...
comment in response to post
www.prnewswire.com/news-release...
comment in response to post
National Academies of Science for 2 straight years identified dozens of flaws in the meta analyses, data sets, mostly from China among populations relying on groundwater wells contaminated with industrial waste, leading to fluoride levels far above municipal drinking water. Here’s just 1 article:
comment in response to post
And when Means withdraws or is not confirmed for Surgeon General, this guy will probably be at the top of Trump’s list as his 3rd SG nominee.
comment in response to post
He continues to make Arkansans proud🙄. Congress abdicated its Art I Sect 8 Cl 1 authority to impose tariffs to the asshat in the WH & French doesn’t know who Mr. Trump is recommending it to. Let’s be clear, Trump bleats out this 🐂 💩 like a fart just to manipulate markets, distract people & enrage.
comment in response to post
And if the experts in that area provided her with a report that concludes that the Qataris are behind a shit ton of the antisemitism, then she would fire them and demand a new report. The cycle would repeat until she got a *report* that suggests Qataris aren’t.
comment in response to post
Yes, but the mere act of announcing the ban was a *win* in the eyes of MAGA world, and courts ruling against the administration will be portrayed as yet another court engaging in *anti-Trump* politics. Everything about this administration is performative and unserious. Sadly, innocents suffer.
comment in response to post
Importantly, children and adults with severe allergies and those who are immunocompromised and unable to safely receive vaccines. This is the fundamental difference between public health, and selfishly intentional ignorance.
comment in response to post
*roundly discredited report on fluoride. Sorry.
comment in response to post
He doesn’t care how long or how much it will cost to refit the plane. He may even get Congress to pass a resolution consenting to the gift *to comply with the Constitution.* They’ll include Fed maintenance, which will allow Mr. Trump and descendants to use it at taxpayer expense post-presidency.
comment in response to post
Yes, it’s clear. But watch the next case to come to The Court on this issue, but with the state represented by a different firm. Barrett won’t recuse & may tip the scales to a 5-4 opinion permitting public funding of religious charter schools. 4-4 isn’t cause for grand celebration. It’s a warning.
comment in response to post
If Oklahoma finds a different law firm to represent a new effort, then Barrett may join a majority, leading to a 5-4 opinion that guts the Establishment Clause. It’s disturbing that The Court was split 4-4 in a case that, a decade ago, would likely have been 7-2. It should have been 8-0 this time.
comment in response to post
Even if funding is restored within the year, it will take years, or a decade or more, to regain what will be lost. Undergrads, graduate students, post-docs, faculty and staff members will follow funding overseas. Clinical investigations and research programs can’t just restart overnight either.
comment in response to post
I used to complain about our homeowners’ association restrictive covenant until atrocities like this started popping up across the country. Living in deep red Arkansas, this neighborhood would look like a Trump rally were it not for the HOA.
comment in response to post
And that’s a big part of their appeal to MAGA world.
comment in response to post
They’re already ignoring the Emoluments & Establishment Clauses, Freedom of Speech & Press, the 5th, 6th, 8th, 10th & 14th Amendments, so why not just ignore the Speech or Debate Clause as well? Shit, he’ll probably order soldiers be boarded in private homes along the border soon (3rd Amendment).
comment in response to post
Your point is correct, but it’s a steeper hill to climb. Removal requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate, so 67 senators have to vote for removal. They want him gone, but are far too cowardly to take the necessary steps to achieve that goal. Their jobs and perks are more important to them than is the U.S.
comment in response to post
Yep. And they’ll likely get many of them, because their “jobs” & “financial interests” are more important to them than US prosperity & constituents’ well-being. Going home won’t provide them with feedback from constituents they represent, because they’ve been told to not meet with us.
comment in response to post
💯! I spent much of my career as an epidemiologist & infectious disease researcher, then leading thousands of other scientists, after leaving the Line. We live by the motto “correlation is not causation.” But it’s so easy to convince rubes that 2 things happening together means 1 caused the other.