Profile avatar
chriscurtis94.bsky.social
Proud Milton Keynesian and Labour MP for MK North. Can't spell, views my own.
165 posts 11,706 followers 494 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Have tried that, didn't work
comment in response to post
Yeah we have become dreadful and slow at building things. That is why e.g. the planning and infa bill and the 10 year infrastructure strategy are so important.
comment in response to post
11) Ending the long term employment disputes with nurses, teachers, junior doctors, Heathrow security staff, criminal barristers, Arriva bus drivers, and BT workers. 12) Handling the Farage riots in an exemplary way 13) The statesmanship of Starmer when handling Trump and the EU. etc. etc. etc.
comment in response to post
Nonsense. The current planning rules fail both nature and building, which is why we have become one of the most nature depleted countries in the world. Rather than wasting money on bat tunnels that do nothing for bats, cash will be spent where it is actually needed, improving nature!
comment in response to post
Not building a railway line in a year?
comment in response to post
Yes, because legislation takes time to scrutinise and pass. That's how our democracy works. You can't fix all the problems this country was left with overnight.
comment in response to post
Yeah fair point. Sure, it's a project that has been under discussion for decades, but the fact that we haven't been able to deliver it in a year really isn't acceptable.
comment in response to post
6) Bringing railways back into public ownership 7) Giving councils proper control of our bus networks to increase connectivity 8) Saving British steel 9) Increasing the national minimum wage 10) Setting up GB Energy to work towards ending our reliance on foreign oil and gas
comment in response to post
If it's "neck-and-neck" for two parties, wouldn't it be 12 necks for four?
comment in response to post
It's simple, you are allowed one for every 2.5 paragraphs no exceptions.
comment in response to post
Is it weighted by past vote?
comment in response to post
To put it another way, this is the one opportunity when you can (almost) force everyone to answer a survey, so you should try to work out the difference between everyone, and people who don't answer surveys when they aren't forced.
comment in response to post
What might this look like? Fewer questions on boilers, more questions on digital exclusion and stuff we know might correlate with online panel membership.
comment in response to post
You selling copies of this?
comment in response to post
My view has always been the same, recent events would always have been tough. We needed government to be at its best. Unfortunately, under the Tories, we had a government at its worst.