justafiction.bsky.social
Refugee from the Ex site. That’s me, Halloween, 20 years ago. Header is Black and Red tulips, which grow in the median of my city’s roads.
656 posts
75 followers
146 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ok, fair.
comment in response to
post
Instead, in Albany NY mayor race, we have 4 Democrats in the primary promising to give more tax money to cops and private businesses. Like, cool, 2 ingredients that when mixed bake a fascism cake, thanks Democrats.
comment in response to
post
I’ve mostly seen people rank Rogue One as either the best, or second best, of all the movies, though I tend to follow smart people with good tastes.
comment in response to
post
Why be so wrong?
comment in response to
post
I’m also adding you to my lists of Nazis.
comment in response to
post
In context, you absolutely sound like a Nazi apologist.
comment in response to
post
They haven’t learned this lesson correctly in over 50 years, so I assume they won’t this time either.
comment in response to
post
The Dem primary voters in NYC are actually just stupid fascists, and the left in their ignorance doesn’t bother to vote in primaries.
comment in response to
post
It’s because fascism is a social disease that infects conservatives and liberals alike.
comment in response to
post
“Policing is a real job.”
comment in response to
post
“Metabluesky” is 100% a literal neonazi btw.
comment in response to
post
You’ve been posting literal fascist propaganda for a few hours now so who are you to talk.
comment in response to
post
You’re apparently getting it from very intentional misreads, either because you’re completely illiterate, or you’re deliberately lying for ideological reasons.
Judging by which way you go with your selective misreads, you appear to actually be a fascist.
comment in response to
post
Do you understand exactly how pathetic it is to be a Will Stancil reply guy?
comment in response to
post
You lost by 2.3 million votes. There’s not that many leftists in the U.S.
You genocidal blue fascists somehow lost by more votes than the number of leftists who exist.
This cannot (technically!) be the lefts’ fault. You lost by far more votes than that.
comment in response to
post
That’s not how politics or elections work. It’s especially not how U.S. Presidential elections work. We don’t vote for parties or presidents in the U.S. and “Lesser Evil Voting” is not a valid strategy, obviously.
comment in response to
post
I only ask because you talk like a boomer with severe lead poisoning.
comment in response to
post
That’s a categorical error. Literally the most basic error you can make in logic. It’s not even the level of fallacy, because it’s just too basic. Did you drink lead as a baby?
comment in response to
post
The U.S. wasn’t merely a lesser evil to Nazi Germany. Your “logic” makes zero sense.
comment in response to
post
Incorrect, technically.
Every election has multiple options, always more than 2. (Unless you’re counting single candidate elections as real elections.)
comment in response to
post
Like, we can either look at recorded history and know it doesn’t work, or think about it logically, and know it doesn’t work.
And yet, everyone in the U.S. thinks it’s a great strategy. I guess because they’re illogical and historically illiterate.
comment in response to
post
It’s crazy that Americans think “lesser evil” is a valid strategy, when never in history did any egalitarian movement ever win by doing it.
From the abolitionists, to the labor movement, to civil rights, each time they fully rejected “lesser evil,” and won gains.
“Lesser evil” always lost.
comment in response to
post
It’s literally not a real (“true”) dichotomy. No election is a dichotomy. The logic of “lesser evil” derives from dichotomy, so it can’t be valid when applied to voting.
It seems your ignorance of logic made you complicit in fascism and genocide. How you feel about that, fascist?
comment in response to
post
Or, if they’re running as a Democrat, we have to support them, according to you.
comment in response to
post
We have to reject the concept of “lesser evil.”
The abolitionists didn’t believe in that, revolutionaries never believed in that, militant labor unionists never believed in that, civil rights leaders never believed in that.
Same time people adopted it, progress literally stopped cold.
comment in response to
post
What are you talking about? 99% of voters voted for one of the two pro-genocide candidates. They certainly didn’t reject “lesser evil.”
comment in response to
post
The stable state, with reasonable maintainable effort, is normal amounts of attention to local and state level politics, and a militant unionist level commitment to stand in solidarity against voting lesser evil.
comment in response to
post
This is why we got to this point. The Dem party is also working to liquidate the working class, but more “quietly”.
Letting them do that while playing Pokémon is how the Republicans end up winning in the next cycle.
How is this not obvious at this point?
comment in response to
post
Are you calling the manager? After spamming and harassing me?
comment in response to
post
You didn’t vote for a viable candidate either, just one that was going to lose, and supported a genocide. You only voted for genocide, not a viable candidate.
comment in response to
post
You fought hard to continue a genocide. You won.
comment in response to
post
Your vote for Harris didn’t matter more than my 3rd party vote, except I put one tally against genocide, and you put one tally for genocide.
Somehow, you think you’re 1 tally for genocide is better than my 1 against.
It seems incontrovertible that you’re just a pro-genocidal Nazi.
comment in response to
post
You voted for genocide, and you won that at least. You happy?
comment in response to
post
No, we should vote for decidedly leftwing candidates only, and never for fiscally conservative ones, is all. But we should vote. If the Dems nominate conservatives, we should protest vote. This is all very simple.
comment in response to
post
For “rich people.”
This is what “fiscal conservatives” of both parties have been demanding for a century, and you finally got what you wished for.
And it’s going to end the country.
comment in response to
post
No.
comment in response to
post
The real world choice was to refuse to endorse or vote for either genocidal candidate. That was a real choice that was available to you.
What you actually accomplished was Trump assuming power over a government whose population explicitly voted to okay genocide.
You gave him a mandate to do it.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. These people don’t get it.
Their vote in support their Genocidal candidate didn’t help Harris win.
It gave Trump a mandate.
Trump entered power in an election where genocidal conditions received 99% of the vote.
That’s horrible, and it was an optional choice they made.
comment in response to
post
The real world choice was to refuse to endorse or vote for either genocidal candidate. That was a real choice that was available to you.
What you actually accomplished was Trump assuming power over a government whose population explicitly voted to okay genocide.
You gave him a mandate to do it.
comment in response to
post
Yes, openly declaring that genocide was fine when Democrats did it does, indeed, hit a nerve. Masterful gambit sadist.
comment in response to
post
My argument is not very different from Egalitarian’s. But i have serious doubts that you can understand the points here, or, you’re ideologically driven to not understand. bsky.app/profile/egal...