semaj1966.bsky.social
64 posts
149 followers
802 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
That is it? Seems like a terribly weak case.
comment in response to
post
Does someone have to shoot them for there to be an identification?
There is video of them brandishing guns at the public... One of these days someone is going to stand their ground
comment in response to
post
That is some serious galaxy - brained Rhodes scholar shit right there
comment in response to
post
Ooh, what are the damages?
comment in response to
post
What an amazing offer, for all those millions of new voters to get only two senators in DC. Can't understand why they think it is jive.
comment in response to
post
The mean IQ of the senators would immediately jump a few points were he to go
comment in response to
post
OK, who, possibly running in 2028, would have been central enough in the Biden administration to be reasonably accused of being some sort of plot to hide the true state of Biden's health?
comment in response to
post
Settlers, not refugees.
comment in response to
post
Anyone remember Don Siegelman? ?
comment in response to
post
So everything, dammit
comment in response to
post
If not fir property taxes, introduced in the 19th century 90% of the population would be serfs. It is the only tool to break an eventual dominance of a tiny land-owning class.
comment in response to
post
Can states trust one another's milk? Is this not an abdication of federal power back to the states?
Milk had a central role in the development of national markets.
comment in response to
post
Point taken, but he is not in Congress.
comment in response to
post
Any names yet regarding this?
comment in response to
post
They might be barred as the case is now appealed.
comment in response to
post
Has Trump overturned the EEOC laws? Without DEI policies, how does an employer defend itself against hostile workplace discrimination claims?
comment in response to
post
No, that really is the work product of a Yale JD.
There is a reason people from less esteemed law schools consider Yale grads to be a bunch of useless political hacks.
comment in response to
post
If the US is paying for the imprisonment, that is, just outsourcing detention, are they not still in US detention? The DOJ holds the key.
comment in response to
post
Any political party apparatus will have a bias toward incumbents.
It is unfortunate but it is normal politics.
comment in response to
post
Bernice lost, nothing was rigged.
Bernice trutherism is ridiculous.
comment in response to
post
Federal civil law, you ignoramus. This is done specifically because, as a civil matter, there is less due process. If it were a matter of criminal law then a prosecuter would have to prove criminal intent. And each deportation would involve a jury trial.
comment in response to
post
I get that you are saying that it is ultimately non-justifiable, but absent a clear state of war we are not at that point yet.
If there is a state of war, rendering civilians to a third-party oubliette is seriously problematic.
comment in response to
post
OK, since the alien enemies act applies, then the Geneva conventions do.
comment in response to
post
Due process always applies, it is just that what process is due is contextual. At the border, very little process applies. Someone with a green card, without a criminal conviction, has much more process that is due.
comment in response to
post
Our laws do not give the government the power to designate a civilian as a terrorist and render them to a death camp in another country. That is a war crime for which a number of Germans were hung.
comment in response to
post
We do we have a process of registering to vote if you have to prove eligibility each time you vote?
comment in response to
post
Can they even be allowed on campus to interview students?
comment in response to
post
Also a war crime, if done under the color of law asserting a state of war is 8n effect. Refer them to the Hague.
comment in response to
post
I drive a Ford in Europe but it was built in Spain and designed for local needs and conditions. Not sold in the USA.
comment in response to
post
If we are at war with Venezuela, then deporting civilians to prison camps in a third country would be a war crime.
I think the focus on due process is is missing the forest for the trees.
comment in response to
post
I was told they would be named Vera, Chuck, and Dave
comment in response to
post
Different guy, and that guy has not been accused of a crime, just wrongthink.
comment in response to
post
Of course, the federal courts lose jurisdiction if you smuggle derendants out of the country. The teach this stuff in law school, people./s
The DOJ lawyers are about to go over niagra falls in a barrel.
comment in response to
post
I am not advocating it, but the only correct response to terrorism is terrorism.
comment in response to
post
London fox?
comment in response to
post
At a basic level, they would live to have the sort of power T is asserting here.
So they want to find a way to defeat the person and the party, but leave the power structure in place.
comment in response to
post
War of 1812 reference. British troops stationed in what is now Canada invaded DC and burned the White House.
I am still pissed off about the Chesapeake, but this is a fair one.
comment in response to
post
Once the importation of slaves was stopped there was a slave bubble. Finance and capital rolled in to invest, and slave loss I sura e protected everyone. Well, everyone who mattered.
comment in response to
post
Domestic enemy of the Constitution
comment in response to
post
Do you have a Linnean type specimen of the Serious Civil Centrist? Some of us are not upon the lingo
comment in response to
post
So, you want a jihad against the 80% of the USA that is not Roman Catholic? You really want to be an enemy of the Constitution when you are such a small minority?
What are you smoking?
comment in response to
post
Here in the lovely, modern, democratic and very Catholic monarchy where I live, you would be considered an absolute loon.
comment in response to
post
If you can't stand by an oath to the Constitution, kindly delf-deport. I live in a Catholic monarchy where people do a better job of balancing church and state than certain fake Catholics like you and Vance.
comment in response to
post
They need to shut down Yale Law School school until they add Con Law 101 to the curriculum.
comment in response to
post
You can't deport citizens. There is no system where that is possible except for totalitarian ones.
comment in response to
post
Only 100%? Such moderation!
comment in response to
post
It is the same Federalist Society crew of fanatical vandals what wrecked the remaining civil society in Iraq.
As always, colonial ventures empower fascist forces in the metripole.
comment in response to
post
You can't cheat a honest man.
comment in response to
post
So close to calling it the golden dawn...
comment in response to
post
Do you remember when, under W, cadres of politically pure right-wing functionaries vetted by Heritage ran the colonial administration of Iraq and made a catastrophe of everything the touched?
Those guys are running the federal government now. Karma is no fun.