When you definitely didn't run your letter purporting that something is not a First Amendment issue by the WH counsel's office—or at least any competent attorney.
Political speech—which is what the WH says the AP Stylebook is in this letter—is core protected speech under the First Amendment.
Political speech—which is what the WH says the AP Stylebook is in this letter—is core protected speech under the First Amendment.
Reposted from
Scott MacFarlane
As part of its filings & request for temporary restraining order against the White House tomorrow, attorneys for Associated Press have submitted to the court a copy of the letter written to the AP by White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles
Letter: "This is purely a privilege of access issue"
====>
Letter: "This is purely a privilege of access issue"
====>
Comments
That's quite an ask...
But also because you keep using your speech to make content we don't like via your style guide
Hmm yes I see
Font change is dead giveaway for copy and past from some LLM.
And it’s a swing and a miss for Susie.
These are now likely to be two separate things…. Which probably explains a lot about this letter…
They didn’t even run it through a grammar checker.
Next paragraph:
"BTW, we specifically revoked your privilege because we don't like your Stylebook and coverage."
Next 3 Paragraphs:
"You need to change it or we will continue to retaliate against you for your speech."
At least we know she’s writing it herself
As if the "duly elected" part carries any special significance. He was just as "duly elected" when we impeached his criminal ass twice before.
“His name was a fiction. It meant “the king is legitimate” - just the kind of name you’d want if you actually were not a legitimate king at all.”
https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9798350800685