Here are the most serious accusations against the “top 10 targets” who we must assume are the worst of the worst, providing the most damning cases:
Includes things like RTing Fauci, donating $10 to Elizabeth Warren in 2019, working for Catholic charities or just having relevant job experience.
Includes things like RTing Fauci, donating $10 to Elizabeth Warren in 2019, working for Catholic charities or just having relevant job experience.
Comments
Lolol, wow
I guarantee that these delightful dipshits are up to their tits in it which is the most fucking ridiculous hypocrisy possible.
If you’re worried about “undue influence,“ interlocking shell corps, real estate transactions are probably a better focus.
But sure, let’s ding the $65k/ year staffer for having to pay for a car repair.
By contrast, ‘worked for the Bar Association once’ is not a legitimate topic of concern in any ethics manuals.
*donated to LGBTQ causes
*spoke on a diversity panel
*helped implement Biden administration policies
*won awards for being good at their jobs
*knows "a notorious bureaucrat"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4oPXHWrqVI
But to juice the accusations, the smear conflates Biden appointees with “career bureaucrats are that implement their orders” (sic). It is completely misleading to present appointees whose job is to be political with career officials!
This is partisan media, but it is not journalism.
And terror relies on publicity to function.
Only a Maidan would stop them.
FAFO is the last stop before Moral Hazard
But as a professor who studies govt, I see the bigger way campus politics has migrated elsewhere is via a project of surveillance, control and threat.