So easily debunked, just like Hegseth's denial of the whole scandal, after the Whitehouse had already confirmed the story. This is where it all burns down.
Someone please correct me, but it’s probably fair to assume that chat has been purged. If anyone from the group is found to have screenshotted it, and there was national security content as alleged, then that person is going to be fucked, and the executive is going to stonewall and move on.
How can our military, our intelligence agencies and what used to be our allies have any trust in this administration after this? I hope they remember it when Trump declares martial law.
In the meantime, if there was no classified information, published the manuscript in full ASAP.
Then Goldberg should call that bluff and publish the whole thing. Let the admin deal with the mess. They need to be held publicly accountable for their incompetence.
“Signal is designed to avoid being tracked by the police or gov’t. Why are you discussing official business on an app that does not save your chats for public record, as required by law? That’s a crime in and of itself, is it not?”
Okay, so no classified materials. Then show the world the full transcript of the damn texts so we can judge for ourselves just how stupid these people are.
Ok if it’s not classified then looking forward to reading the entire text chain in The Atlantic. Let us decide what we think about this. I’m sure it’s bad.
That's a sample, enough to tell anyone that "this shouldn't have been seen" not to mention they talk like it's a video game they're playing while dads asleep! (My Q, don't pres have to okay & sign the choices on when&how to💥 un-alive someone?)
every journalist on earth needs to save this video in several places and then put in a FOIA request for the entire unredacted chat log using this video as justification.
Can’t think of a single scenario, in a corporate setting, where that kind of “mistake” involving confidential information on an alternative communications channel would not result in the immediate termination of all involved.
The Director of National Intelligence just testified that the information was NOT classified.
That should give Jeffrey Goldberg the clearance to publish the exchange.
I'm anxiously awaiting the publication.
Goldberg won’t do that, because unlike the DNS director, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Treasury, Secretary of State, he takes operational security seriously.
This what thoroughly sickens me…you know what you saw, you know what you heard, but everything maga says, nope, you didn’t see that, you didn’t hear that, right?
It is gaslighting at the highest level.
Simple test: If the contents of the messages weren't classified "materials," why didn't they just include the Houthi rebels in the unauthorized discussion channel?
Well, the people lying are fucking psychopaths that have been doing it for quite some time. The folks asking the questions, at least most of them, have some empathy for the American people and feel some emotions.
Only name of our foreign data collector, risk that entire servaince network? 🖕🏼no classified material BS, trump regime is dangerous to national security.
She’s such a smug asshole. That flat-faced, slow-blink is something I recognize as a defiant liar who is pissed off at being questioned. He should have pressed her a LOT harder and told her he thought she was lying and should be impeached….then watch her face.
And if it wasn’t designated classified- when it should have been bc it was the whole operation given to random ppl- that is also a national security breach.
Man she’s a lousy liar, her discomfort was patently obvious when she answered. Not because she has a problem lying, it’s the fear that she could easily get caught in the lie. We know a person who has those messages on his phone.
The chairman helped them on live tv skirt perjury by putting words into their mouths with his “not classified in their department no control over another department” comments.
That look on her face says it all... She knows she's toast and she's just trying to keep her head above water by deflecting until the administration goons toss her a life ring.
She's more vile and more loathsome every time she appears. A complete fraud on the American people. Her dishonesty and corruption in favor of foreign nations shows contempt and disdain for the very flag and country she claims to represent. She's a terrible person.
How is a secret plan for a US airstrike in Yemen **not** classified info? Or is Tulsi Gabbard playing a semantic game by asserting that there were no “classified materials”—as opposed to “classified information”—shared in the Signal chat? https://bsky.app/profile/jennycohn.bsky.social/post/3ll7mxvoepk23
Exactly…they go for semantics for all point:
- war plan/NO, military strike plan
-classified material/NO, information
- texting/No, Signal base communication
- and so and so and so on
I’m waiting for the “we use emoji as encrypted communication support”
You can bet everything that Tulai Gabbard is at best playing games and at worst lying her ass off. I will never get over how 99.9% of Congress members have no clue how to state a clear question and to follow up to a witness’s answer esp when they haven’t answered the question!!!!!
It’s the same semantic game Hegseth played by saying “no war plans texted”. It was an attack plan and it was signal messages not texting(sms). Allows them to deceive and gives plausible deniability when accused of lying.
The attack plan, the strike package of assets, the time of the strike, and methods and how the information was gathered (sources). Sure that’s not classified.
Oh that’s an interesting parse of her reply. “Material” maybe meaning images, PDFs, etc. However, I think we can all agree that “material” can also mean “information” which it’s clear that was shared.
She knows the weaponized DOJ ain't gonna do shit to her. So she feels no need to tell the truth and can lie with impunity. Same with the rest of the Trump Regime the Senate and House question.
He should threaten to, he did everything right by leaving and notifying them and confirming it's real. At this stage, the WH is publicly lying, so he can say "either tell the truth, or I'll share the information" via whatever proper channels he can, bc you know the WH wants to punish the journalist
Oh yeah, airstrike planning discussions about active wars are famously unclassified. You can chat about them to anyone really - post them on Facebook, run them by your local bartender, whatever.
Intel agencies are always chill about it. I mean, it's hardly a life or death national security matter.
It's why typically when US military planners discuss such topics, they setup Sharing Collaborative Information Facilities (SCIF).
These are basically soap boxes you place at a local park or outside the town hall, where planners can gather to talk over the details through megaphones with the public.
LMAO. Maybe this is absurd hair splitting? Eg, the exact chats they sent each other did not go through a formal classification process prior to being sent?
But if you feel no need to be charitable it’d be more accurate to call it a lie.
What the fuck is that face she's making?! She got caught out in a lie, her argument exploded, and she looks like she's watching a documentary about fucking rollerskating or something.
Am I misunderstanding something? It sounded to me like that's what he said, that if it wasn't classified then she needed to share the messages with the committee. Said she "can't have it both ways".
He told us about Yemen so we could corroborate. He also said that there were human targets and additional things he did not release because they hadn’t happened yet.
I'm talking about what the senator in the video said. He told Tulsi that either the texts are classified and therefore can't be shared with the investigating committee, or they're not classified and can be shared. She seemed not to respond, though the video did cut off shortly after.
Right. The journalist that was in the group chat only printed some of what was in the group chat, not all of it. If it’s not classified, in theory, he could print all of it. Including the specific Human targets. He also implied there were other things that haven’t been done yet.
Oh, yeah, I totally get all of that. I don't know that it would be smart to publicly post it though if it truly does have names of active intelligence members and such in it.
The post does not share the entirety of the video clip. In fact, the next question was, "If this was not classified please share the conversation with the committee."
Thank you Mark Warner. I feel even less safe than I did on Sunday. Since when are battle plans not top secret? Hegseth and company are posers. They are not meritorious hires!
OPSEC is not limited to classified information. It's any information that the adversay can use to disrupt operational success. This hair-splitting is itself indicative that they have no place in the command structure of any organization that deploys lethal force, whether law enforcement or military.
Then she should give her permission for the release of the entire conversation without fear of reprisal or threat of jail for Mr. Goldberg.
It's as simple as that. She is smearing a reporter's stellar reputation.
Putin probably already has the complete transcript of the conversation anyway.
Who does she think she’s fooling??? Fucking lying ass hypocrite. Bitch would lie about anything to cover her ass.
All of the felon’s appointments are liars who are like a kid stealing a cookie, thinking if they say it with conviction everyone will believe them when the evidence is clear as day.
Or anyone, to be sure. Who sides with dictators and then considers themselves a patriot to the country of their citizenship??? A hypocrite and traitor does.
Comments
Just an absolute guarantee, every time.
https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3ll65pznahk2v
In the meantime, if there was no classified information, published the manuscript in full ASAP.
She’s a fraud
“Signal is designed to avoid being tracked by the police or gov’t. Why are you discussing official business on an app that does not save your chats for public record, as required by law? That’s a crime in and of itself, is it not?”
pathalogical liars
can you fit
in one room?
i guess we just found out
Therin lies the problem...
Her answers reek. 🦨
That should give Jeffrey Goldberg the clearance to publish the exchange.
I'm anxiously awaiting the publication.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/?link_source=ta_thread_link&taid=67e3f1a5047827000189fda4&utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=true-anthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=threads.net
It is gaslighting at the highest level.
No?
Just me then...
The Atlantic needs to release the transcripts to the committee.
Then charge Tulsi for contempt and false statements under oath.
How is that not CLASSIFIED
I can’t believe they’re lying when he has proof.
And if it wasn’t designated classified- when it should have been bc it was the whole operation given to random ppl- that is also a national security breach.
Sure Cruella. How these assholes lie.
1. Attack attack attack.
2. Admit nothing, deny everything.
3. Always claim victory.
In other words, assume everything is a lie.
#FTG
✌️
Putin's first Narional Security Advisor spy, General Michael Flynn only lasted a couple weeks, and now Tulsi might be out soon too?
Putin doesn't know how to pick them
It's a lock.
Only the mechanism remains to be revealed.
- war plan/NO, military strike plan
-classified material/NO, information
- texting/No, Signal base communication
- and so and so and so on
I’m waiting for the “we use emoji as encrypted communication support”
she's smart enough to be treasonous
Sick
Easy to spot a lying crook.
Intel agencies are always chill about it. I mean, it's hardly a life or death national security matter.
These are basically soap boxes you place at a local park or outside the town hall, where planners can gather to talk over the details through megaphones with the public.
But if you feel no need to be charitable it’d be more accurate to call it a lie.
They are not classified, or you wouldn't have used Signal, right?"
Absolutely everything about her is explained by her being a devoted member of a crazy Hare Krishna personality cult.
Must have been done behind his back...
So then the follow-up Q is, "OK. Please share with the Committee and the public, here and now, the content of those not-classified messages."
It's as simple as that. She is smearing a reporter's stellar reputation.
Putin probably already has the complete transcript of the conversation anyway.
https://youtu.be/0ZaNpNBEZ2Q?si=33z4R2t-_yDeDqcw
Let pissed off Americans decide.
🤥
All of the felon’s appointments are liars who are like a kid stealing a cookie, thinking if they say it with conviction everyone will believe them when the evidence is clear as day.
https://www.threads.net/@brittainforsenate/post/DHqb0rWxewe?xmt=AQGz_-U-zmiMCijIilzdGcpWBeE-zc1bwAi0Gs0cJJ9lOA
so goldberg can just release them
Yes, there was no slide shared or the actual signed plan but that doesn’t mean the things they were talking about weren’t classified.
JFC
Russian asset.