Well, you knew it would.
Gaming is an important part of our society and is serious business for many.
I'm sure if you said, "religion is an invaluable tool in teaching children to find and kill non-believers," Bluesky would have reacted the same.
Gaming is an important part of our society and is serious business for many.
I'm sure if you said, "religion is an invaluable tool in teaching children to find and kill non-believers," Bluesky would have reacted the same.
Comments
I'm not questioning the joke nor does my reply insinuate that.
My reply is in regards to the surprise writing, "killing god" in a post would get reaction. I just wrote it in a different way.
But you can't have gaming with out the development.
Nuff said.
MY point was the "surprise" to reaction for a post designed for reaction. My example was just to point out causing reaction is easy.
In fact, the more people react to what I said is proving my point
I know he's not serious & my example has clearly been misunderstood by "his audience."
Now I have to deal with the push back from "his audience." Good times.
(To be very clear, this is NOT a defense of said churches, they can go fuck off and die, I'm just curious about the factual matter I guess)
I'm not 100% convinced, but it does make it uncertain in my mind. Again, fuck *anyone* who's like that, I am in NO terms defending anyone
I am agreeing that, what he said would get Bluesky to react the way they did. The same way they would id he said something about religion. That's all.
The pretend surprise a "killing god" post got reaction.
I know it was a joke. I don't care about killing god, do what you like.
But "surprise" saying that got reaction is insincere at best.
And in no way was I saying you were wrong with your OP, but the reaction just felt disingenuous. Nothing personal.
An clearly my comparison was too much