As a law prof who teaches Professional Responsibility (aka legal ethics), the fact that Ken Paxton has a law license really makes me question the efficacy of my job.
the people deciding what stories are the priorities will just never, ever choose to accept that what Republicans do could possibly be as genuinely wrong & cruel as they obviously are, so they're going to at best glide across those events which lay such things bare
I don't think Texans "deserve" this for not voting, but I do find the not voting frustrating given the hellscape the state has become under GOP misrule. I'd vote against these motherfuckers at every opportunity! But I know the GOP exists to foreclose that opportunity for voters it finds inconvenient
He has done something monstrous, outrageous, in gross violation of a citizen’s autonomy and freedom. Flexed his authoritarian muscle to rob her of fundamental rights.
How is this not more outrageous than Ivy presidents and their WilmerHale-speak?
Comments
I think it's got multiple parts.
* Denial. Dictatorship can't happen here
* Yucky messy ladyparts stuff
* What, you mean women have rights?
It's not so much that the other has more pull. It's that reporterly minds shy away from more difficult topics.
Have we not figured that out yet??
And liberals think we deserve this because we don't vote. Collective punishment.
So no one cares what happens to us. We are not valued by anyone.
This is TXGOP at their best, and TDP at their worst. The state party just sucks and the national party won't do anything about it.
How is this not more outrageous than Ivy presidents and their WilmerHale-speak?