Europe and Kyiv thus have the opportunity to force their terms on Moscow and Washington, by designing and deploying a force that would create genuine deterrence against further Russian aggression.
/25
/25
Comments
Clearly needs to but thats been so for 10 yrs & nothing has changed
/26
/27
I think Trump will want a quick UKR deal, for no other reason than wanting the Nobel prize he believes he deserve.
/END
Russia is worse off than when they "first" invaded in every possible way. Ukraine is worse off in some ways, better off in others. I'd clearly rather be Ukraine than Russia, but...
Parallels
Some big ifs.🤞
Carpe diem
But as soon as Russian attacks logistics centres or a drone lands somewhere it shouldn't, article 5 can still be used
And yet Europe must take its own destiny into its own hands and arm itself militarily, preferably in Ukraine first in order to secure our own security there most efficiently
unroll
Powered by @skywriter.blue
Hovering over all of this, though, is that Trump’s “thinking” is not logical or coherent. It may shift from day to day or hour to hour depending on who is in his ear or simple whim.
How can there be any predictability in such a situation?
That’s what is going to happen, eventually.
And if they don’t agree, get ready because we might be facing a global conflict as I predicted two years ago.
The geopolitical balance of power is shifting in front of your eyes!
Be aware and be ready!
Trump was asked if he'd still be sending weapons to Ukraine
He said yes "otherwise it would look like Russia has won"
Doesn't make sense with everything else but that's the main thing is has holding russia back
And if west can buy them too, could be ok
The Russian economy is weak so Trump will want to put his business interests into play. Trump First.
It would humble Trump, weaken Russia, strengthen Europe and empower Ukraine.
They can only up spending to replace USA & guarantee to continue supplying Ukraine irrespective of USA.