This great video also reminded me of an interesting facet of motonormativity: people can lose 100 hours a year in traffic and never notice; but they have one late train and it's all "Never again - you can't rely on them"
Reposted from
Prof. Ian Walker
"Everything you thought you knew about roads is a lie" GCN go hard on induced demand and all the other follies linked to road building www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVq7...
Comments
Any non-road network where the services is frequent enough that you don't have to check the timetable lets you think differently.
Might as well ask for the moon on a stick.
(Written by a bike rider who began riding 17 years ago when they’d grown frustrated and hated so much of their car centric life)
Typical journey by car - timing is some sort of skewed normal distribution. Easier to accommodate.
Typical journey by train - mostly bang on time, sometimes waaay off. Harder to accommodate.
Plus, you never "just miss" a car.
Personally I'd rather be delayed somewhere with a toilet, possibly a cafe, and the prospect of getting part or all of my fare refunded rather than in a metal box.
My question is about the frequency and severity (and experience, as you point out).
I might be wrong, though.
We are creating the norm of speeding.
People were doing 75-80 mph in a 55 mph road construction zone on I-5 in N SD County.
The Kinetic Energy of a car going 80 mph is 2.1x the KE of one doing 55.
Driving to my alternate office is 45 minute am, 45-120 minutes pm.
If a train is late, I just keep reading. No stress.