Has Kim Kardashian gone MAGA? She parties with Ivanka Trump and has turned Tesla products into fashion accessories on social media, but assuming these are political statements may be incorrect. https://nyti.ms/4eJyjEZ
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Kardashian just wants to make more money, be famous and hang out with people in power. She has no convictions and no values. She wants to be part of the oligarchs who gravitate around the dictator.
Billionaires must be eradicated.
Regroup, rebel and revolt.
Could the New York Times suck any harder? They write attempted click bait stories about entitled little dipshits their readers couldn't give a fuck about but assume they can justify it as a trendy think piece.
She's rich enough to avoid any consequences of Project 2025, will benefit massively from tax cuts for the rich, and sees a massive opportunity to sell garbage to the dumbest demographic on the planet. Of course she is MAGA.
The Kardashians and Trumps have the same business model. Have no talent and sale crap to poor dumb ppl, and make them believe that “ they to can be like them. Talentless and Successful..
Exactly.
And it just so happens that grifting on behalf of greed aligns perfectly with the rightwing oligarchs & sycophants controlling the body politic now
So the NYT us wrong, because the subtext IS aligned w a political ideology
And you're right it's about greed and we should stop giving a shit
She is MAGA and she is probably being paid by Elon to normalize his shit, plus she is front and center for the revival of thinpedimic that we will see in the next years. Truly and American royal.
She knows how to make money and how to play both sides for profit. That is literally all this is. When the time comes she will make a financial decision not a moral one.
No, she's exactly what she's always been--an shameless opportunist who doesn't care about a single thing beyond her personal status. She's whatever gets her invited to the next function.
She’s been a trumper for a long time. The NYT on the other hand has really been Trump place for puff pieces with rotten research for him for a short time
Seriously Times? This is what you got? Vapid idiot has vapid tastes is not really a story. How about the nominee for SecDef is woefully unqualified and dangerous? The nominee for National Intelligence has none and is a Russian asset?
That was always a family of Orange County Republicans, meaning they were concerned with protecting their wealth first. As the winds blew towards MAGA, so did they.
I honestly do not care, and if you care about it, you should have your head examined, it’s not like this lady has never gone with an insane Nazi before.
Can somebody explain. Why is this at all interesting?
Can it be that choosing this tidbit of news instead of en explanatory piece on something relevant is part of the reason stupidity rules?
She posted a picture w/ Ivanka the week of the election & never once posted anything about voting or in support of Kamala. But she’s posted paragraphs about how the Menendez bros should be let out of jail. Shes not for the everyday American, she’s for f’ing them over while selling them her crap.
She is just a rich highly privileged American woman with tie to other rich people that took TWO BILLION DOLLARS from the f'n Saudis who have ties to terrorists. Yeah, She so fly...NOT
Who knows but she’s helping people wrongly convicted! So she might just try to keep herself in the good side of the 👿…. Or she is just plain Maga! She is the only one who knows!
Is the US becoming an oligarchy? Russians live it and seem to like it, will US citizens be the same? Will the idea of them being a powerful nation be enough to quell their need for actual rights?
Kim convinced Trump to pardon Alice Marie Johnson & free others. If she’s going to use her celebrity & beauty to bring forth positive outcomes then so be it. Beautiful women have power & rn we need ppl in their circle.
Comments
I have a better question: who the FUCK cares about what this person says or thinks?
Billionaires must be eradicated.
Regroup, rebel and revolt.
Keep on being you NYT.
And it just so happens that grifting on behalf of greed aligns perfectly with the rightwing oligarchs & sycophants controlling the body politic now
So the NYT us wrong, because the subtext IS aligned w a political ideology
And you're right it's about greed and we should stop giving a shit
2. Select “mute words & tags” and enter Kardashian.
3. Never hear about a Kardashian again. (Well, here at least.)
Same goes with MAGA 🙃.
❤️Like💬Comment👥Share
NYT, however, has become the dollar store for "news"
No, she's exactly what she's always been--an shameless opportunist who doesn't care about a single thing beyond her personal status. She's whatever gets her invited to the next function.
In world full bottom dwelling leaches like the Kardashians.
Be Carl Sagan.
Stop it.
Can it be that choosing this tidbit of news instead of en explanatory piece on something relevant is part of the reason stupidity rules?
Are you even for real right now?
I prefer insightful reporting on important issues.
Teach girls to stand up and think for themselves
And not for what’s popular
thread🧵
https://bsky.app/profile/edhirsch.bsky.social/post/3lbo6txhgfk2j