If I were in charge of a country whose pride is almost entirely in its penchant for violence and almost unfettered access to firearms, I would not make the decision to remove access to anti-psychotics. That's just me though.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Mentally ill people are rarely dangerous to anyone but ourselves. Removing people's meds is shitty and awful, but not because it will lead to murderous rampages.
Fam, there are a whole lot of decisions over the past month that have me thinking “You do understand that there are A LOT of mfers with A LOT of guns in the raggedy nation, right?”
Anyways, let me practice non-violence in front of my television, because that’s what EYE do.
Even if I'm thinking purely in self-interest. As a public figure easily identifiable as the source of millions of dangerously unmedicated citizens' unnecessary suffering? Why would I make myself that kind of target?
You're going to strip people of their livelihoods, their ability to support themselves and their families, providing them ample free time to stew in your insistence that they are not full human beings, remove their coping medications, and leave the guns out there???
Comments
Anyways, let me practice non-violence in front of my television, because that’s what EYE do.
I’m just saying.
Sounds like a dare to me.
if the Dems don’t form a shadow cabinet, or gum up the works of state, then the GOP wish for a left tea party for them to mow down will come true —
the only way this government stays together is for democrats to hold it together, not hand fascists the tools to dismantle it.