This is a distraction.
Misdirection so that you skip past the true ethical issues of stolen IP, environmental issues, the fate of those who will lose their jobs, and basic cui bono.
Rush to protect artificial 'life' rights before other lives matter.
Fuck off, leading philosopher.
Misdirection so that you skip past the true ethical issues of stolen IP, environmental issues, the fate of those who will lose their jobs, and basic cui bono.
Rush to protect artificial 'life' rights before other lives matter.
Fuck off, leading philosopher.
Reposted from
Dan McNeil
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Comments
I want to scream every time people talk about "AI" as anything other than a bunch of fancy math that stitches words or pixels together.
But he's Biz School not Humanities, so too busy cashing corporate checks.
It always demands some kind of emotional extrapolation of some present performance.
Did we just assume they were ok all this time?
We need to make our own journalistic endeavors. While I am no journalist, I'd still like to assist. My gut tells me you are an intelligent man, might you have any advice on how to do such a thing?
#NewsByUs maybe? I'm just spitballing. But our friends are out there, and they're waiting on us, we just gotta find them.
I do have a qualification in economics but I know how worthless it is in today's world.
His audience, also in bunny suits but with worn red meshback caps, warms to the task. A mechanical voice intones "Father. More dactyls please."
They'll make sure you *have* to pay for it.
What the fuck is going on
From what you've said, and the Guardian article, I assume the fear that there will be societal divide over this seems pretty valid, as any kind of definitive proof is impossible.
Here's that talk by leading AI ethicist Timnit Gebru that I keep posting addressing the REAL design issues.
A fascinating 45 minutes.
https://youtu.be/P7XT4TWLzJw
https://bsky.app/profile/mighterbump.bsky.social/post/3lb5rhqraoc2j