1. Yesterday, Montana's Judiciary Committee voted to advance a bathroom ban for trans adults along party lines.
The rationale a Republican used? That some trans women are attracted to women.
It begs the question how he feels about lesbians in bathrooms.
Subscribe to support my journalism.
The rationale a Republican used? That some trans women are attracted to women.
It begs the question how he feels about lesbians in bathrooms.
Subscribe to support my journalism.
Comments
Like they think that it's just toilets with no doors or something. That or they think girls compare body parts. https://youtu.be/RC-e5vs6NeY?si=AmzCkySswOh299N5&t=129
Fuuucking nowhere. Cause it collapses their entire arguments and world view. Just hammer home the buzzwords and don't look back as you rack in votes from boogeymen obsessed weirdos that already forgot about the "price of eggs" stuff
And now we start seeing that domino affect, that starts with denying trans people basic rights.
1. That they're so obsessed with our junk
2. That they're so obsessed with our pee
3. That they're so obsessed with who we date
Those sorts of obsessions belong in a pornhub search, and nowhere else.
Why don't they just pass a law to make all restrooms unisex? Problem eliminated. Maybe post a sign outside to warn others that there may be MAGAs inside.
It was introduced by Kerri Seekins-Crowe, who famously stated that she would not allow her child to transition if it would prevent their suicide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuGw66CiKq4
Those speaking against it included a domestic violence shelter in her own district.
Trans men also showed up in huge numbers to speak against the bill, asking how the state would feel about them in women's bathrooms.
Notably, this has been used to ban lesbians from women's spaces as late as 2002.
That’s pretty pathetic even for a bigot.
Sitting quietly across from a christofacist who is lies to frame trans people needing to use the bathroom as predators?
No goddamn way.
Their arguments *always* fall apart under even minimal scrutiny, because they're incoherent.
Or, should we just acknowledge that gender segregation in restrooms isn’t a substitute for privacy and safety in design and operation?
Religion has no business in government.
That guy is projecting what *he* would do in a bathroom, which is concerning.
It’s the usual fake outrage that republicans like to generate.
It's a bathroom. I am there to perform a bodily function. I am walking in, going into a stall, closing the door, and getting on with my day.
Basically.