I'm doubtful that Garland going on TV more often would have made any difference. The problem is that one major party and the majority of voters don't give a shit about the rule of law and would rather see an AG making unconstitutional threats on TV than judiciously enforcing the laws.
Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies; liable for rape by a jury; indicted for other crimes we all witnessed on our televisions happen live….
I am astounded people believe if Trump had just been convicted one more time it would have made any difference. He could have still won from a prison cell.
It would have been nice if Garland would explain why he allowed all this to happen, after the Senate report written by Rubio (who should also be asked why he is in this administration) and Mueller’s report and especially J6.
Comments
I'll hate myself for that in the morning.
These posts don’t cohere.
Garland failed at messaging which is (now) a key part of the job. He also failed to indict Trump.
Bondi is horrifying but telegenic; saying mildly you prefer when AG’s aren’t seems or heard is..odd
I am astounded people believe if Trump had just been convicted one more time it would have made any difference. He could have still won from a prison cell.
And RFK, but that... didn't end well.