Rice: "We think that's a request for a substantive right to engage in non-conforming behavior."
What? WHAT?
A: YOU ALREADY HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT CONFORM
B: The question here is whether you have a right to equal protection.
What? WHAT?
A: YOU ALREADY HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT CONFORM
B: The question here is whether you have a right to equal protection.
Comments
"Protection" is what makes a "Right" a "Right" instead of a "risk".
He only does this when his side is getting the shit kicked out of it by the liberal women, as was just happening.
KBJ: "What's your basis for saying that?"
It really doesn't take a lot of pushing to make these people reveal their bigotry.
What a fucking joke of a court.
Does intermediate scrutiny apply Amy!
If it does its not even that high a burden to show a compelling government interest.
A "right to conform" is just obedience made compulsory.
A democracy without non-conformity becomes autocracy by the many; groupthink writ large.