Proposed new rule: Anyone who questions the role of civil and human rights in the Democratic platform can get punted into the fucking sun
Reposted from
Joe Katz
Proposed new rule:
If you say something like "I support trans rights but can't we agree they've played an outsized role in Democratic politics?" you need to be prepared to offer a minimum of 3 examples of what exactly you mean by that.
If you say something like "I support trans rights but can't we agree they've played an outsized role in Democratic politics?" you need to be prepared to offer a minimum of 3 examples of what exactly you mean by that.
Comments
“the economic programs […] of fascist movements were extremely conservative, favouring the wealthy far more than the middle class and the working class.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism/Conservative-economic-programs
Our platform is good, our rhetoric and word choice is garbage.
We need to find a way to pitch our platform to middle America; we have to refine our messaging, not our message.
People hate Obamacare and love the Affordable Care Act; unfortunately for us, people have a way of judging books by covers.
I think our message is good, it's the messaging that wins or loses us; elections are about sales, marketing, and advertising, they always have been.
We got good nouns! Our verbs could use some work.