There is nothing more regressive and no greater symptom of fascism than #adoption which is based in indentured servitude and not family creation. The bourgeois liberal use of adoption as a “progressive” trope is heinous and sickmaking. Not your prop.
I think the point he's making is easy to get
- do things that are effective against trump, not things that even though they are virtuous and morally correct and stand up for others do nothing to him.
Go directly against him and all the atrocities he commits.
There's lots there.
It’s a counterproductive strategy. You go to represent your district, not to bring the district in your love life while you use your children as diversity props.
I'm a male Democrat but I don't like queers...quit highlighting them..and I agree will not allowing males in women's sports. You lost the election from young men..figure it out..me too.
'BUT' you don't like queers - do all other Democrats 'like' queers?
And you know, I don't think you're going to be the person who allows/ doesn't allow trans women in sports.
You may not like LGBTQ people and that’s fine. But we are citizens and we have civil rights and we have constitutional rights under the 14th amendment to be free from discrimination in housing, employment and healthcare. Just don’t vote for anyone willing to violate our rights please.
This is why your grandkids dread dealing with you. You can call yourself anything you like, but you're just an old out of touch bigot. This young men who think like you are considered unfuckable for a reason.
What’s your point? The dems should definitely defend this family’s right to exist. Which is under threat. Of course that should not be the totality of their response.
I'll take action over performance any day. Action takes many forms but I'm thinking that the best action Dems could take now is to hold town halls in their districts to get a good sense of the displeasure with trump/elon/Congress, and also rally the citizens to get involved with protests and voting.
I think being queer and showing a public display of affection with a blended racial family actually is pretty radical. So I don't understand why you would single these folks out randomly? Could you explain your point?
“Take that Trump” — you think that’s gonna do shit to him? He doesn’t care about this shit. He cares about power and self-enrichment, revenge, and winning.
Got it. So the issue is with saying "take that Trump". I guess I would still contend that this was pretty radical but perhaps changing the phrase from "take that Trump" to something like "we aren't going anywhere" would have been better in hindsight but I do remember the 2018 cycle being good for us
Comments
#adopteesky 🥚
https://www.albikar.org/wparchive/diz/adoption-in-an-economic-and-political-context/
- do things that are effective against trump, not things that even though they are virtuous and morally correct and stand up for others do nothing to him.
Go directly against him and all the atrocities he commits.
There's lots there.
If you're willing to sell out on gay or trans rights, you're willing to sell out on anybody else's rights.
And you know, I don't think you're going to be the person who allows/ doesn't allow trans women in sports.
Also...
We fucking blasted them in 2018 I thought? It was a fucking blowout?
All while our representatives wear pink and hold little signs.