Hope people understand the trajectory that we’re on: if the executive is arguing that it has no recourse once people here end up in a prison in El Salvador, then that’s the precedent for there being no recourse when this starts happening to United States citizens.
Reposted from
Asha Rangappa
I can’t see how this position helps the U.S. government when it comes to the need for a preliminary injunction. One of the factors is “irreparable harm”. If the government’s own claim is that it has no recourse once people are in El Salvador, even by mistake, it’s conceding that factor
Comments
These are not deportations, they are illegal abductions by government officials. They should be tried, and will be after this regime ends.
And yes, it's just a matter of time before he feels comfortable enough to send political opponents and protesters to places like this.
😳
Who's paying them to house the prisoners?
Anything can change if you want it to.
“This wasn’t the evil of ill intent toward Kilmar,” Mr. Sandoval-Moshenberg said. “It was the evil of apathy as to whether or not they deport the right person.”
It's "won't" bring him back.
This is such as basic legal principle. Idjuts….
-Fired his Attorney General & 5 Supreme Court Justices
-Sent soldiers to intimidate his Congress
-Reduced seats in Congress from 84 to 60
-Censored the free press
Declared a fake emergency, appointed a new Supreme Court who let him stay in office past his term