Oh well this is pretty simple that's illegal I'm sure they won't just make an exception for billionaires - ThreadSky

eve6.bsky.social • 75 days ago

Oh well this is pretty simple that's illegal I'm sure they won't just make an exception for billionaires

Reposted from Please Follow the Official Guardian Account

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says

Comments

eve6.bsky.social•75 days ago

I live under an alternative rock

eve6.bsky.social•75 days ago

The teenager who got sued by metallica for torrenting ride the lightning

badhorse.bsky.social•75 days ago

Lars is a jerk

wheatus.com•75 days ago

i love that it won't work anyway

pinkemina.bsky.social•75 days ago

I remember when they did that, and I never listened to Metallica another day in my life. All the CDs & shirts I'd spent my money on are in a box and will never see the light of day again.

Felt like a personal betrayal against paying fans...downloading was easier than ripping the discs myself.

buckeyeboy50.bsky.social•75 days ago

There's dudes still in debt from riaa being lawsuit happy, nowadays I can just download any song off Spotify in a couple minutes or just use Spotify

synchroni.city•75 days ago

My roommate in college got busted and settled for $5k for torrenting Take My Breath Away from the Top Gun soundtrack.

erickinkead.bsky.social•75 days ago

I got a sternly written letter from a New York attorney that got me to stop torrenting movies back in the day.

tweeterreprise.bsky.social•75 days ago

Sounds like they took his $5k away.

nikkiynot.bsky.social•75 days ago

That’s a lot of trips on the Metro

moneymandible.bsky.social•75 days ago

imagine taking that hit for berlin.

BERLIN, JERRY.

supersaiga.bsky.social•75 days ago

there were no torrents, you had to get the whole file from one peer on Napster. if they went offline while you were downloading that was it, you'd have to start again.

I used to wait till everyone downloading was finished before going offline

anomalousmomma.bsky.social•75 days ago

Eve 6 would never sue me for [allegedly] torrenting Inside Out.

aether.us•75 days ago

There are tools out there that pull tunes off of Spotify...just sayin'.

ripperelse.bsky.social•75 days ago

;alsdfk;ladjs jesus christ

badgernoonan.bsky.social•75 days ago

Now more than ever, we need a resurgence of Snap.

frozenglitter.bsky.social•75 days ago

Alexandrite? Painite? Black opal?
(Please don't alternative block me for this bad joke)

zaktastic.bsky.social•75 days ago

I’m Three Doors Down from you.

theocean85.bsky.social•75 days ago

I live under a Fraggle Rock

jon-k.bsky.social•71 days ago

Their argument seems fair to me, assuming all their code is 100% open source and not protected by some kind of copyright

hardik666.bsky.social•75 days ago

So can we make straight up copies of ChatGPT and monetize them?

elainealimonti.bsky.social•75 days ago

Ok then I guess no AI. Problem solved!

beardedpip.bsky.social•75 days ago

Or.....hear me out....they could pay the artists for using their copywrited work. Also an idea that was not even remotely considered.

dennisakaodin.bsky.social•75 days ago

Because these shitstain AI programs work by sheer mass, they can’t afford it… even they wouldn’t dare send out letters to authors saying „Hey how’s 0.063c for each book you wrote sound?“

johnnyapplememes.bsky.social•75 days ago

Remember when it was illegal for restaurants to sing the Happy Birthday song? Lulz.

srirachachili.bsky.social•75 days ago

kereminde.bsky.social•75 days ago

Law isn't about not being able to do it, it's about punishing people after the fact.

In this case by a fine.

... which will just be paid off from a slice of the profits. Even though the cost is outpacing the profits still, from what I understand...

xenusparadox.bsky.social•75 days ago

Well then they don't deserve to exist

clowncone.bsky.social•75 days ago

I can’t become a millionaire if i don’t steal $999,999.99 from you cmon bro be cool

shanzival.bsky.social•75 days ago

The infinite monkey typewriter engine needs to be fed all of Shakespeare's work before it can produce a much worse version of Hamlet.

dumpstatdave.bsky.social•75 days ago

There's a big difference between what's "illegal" and what "the police will arrest you for."

teletextsmcgee.bsky.social•75 days ago

Surely they're stealing from other billionaires though? Like Disney and Nintendo can't be sound with it.

devrawiz.bsky.social•75 days ago

UK authors are starting to be harrassed by their publishers to allow their work to be used to train AI systems. This is obviously not a good idea for authors. However, in this crazy world, the dumb AI systems do need feeding the best, most accurate, well-thought out material from the knowledgeable.

roastedtato.bsky.social•75 days ago

The solution is simple, if it can't be built without taking things you dont own, then it cannot be owned by any one person, only by everyone in common. Its a shame the fundamental right of this society is ownership or it would be obvious to everyone.

panicatthedogpark.bsky.social•75 days ago

Geez, I dunno, I’m sure there’s a solution to this terrible conundrum *somewhere*…..If only I knew how to contact the authors……..
🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

marytylerless.bsky.social•75 days ago

Yes, of course! A higher code of ethics applies to our 1% “leaders.” 🥰

kraniumkracka.bsky.social•75 days ago

Looking forward to the class action suit and receiving my check for 11 cents!

ds00n.bsky.social•71 days ago

Idk about you, but I’m 1/4th Irish Catholic from Northern Ireland and well…

rob-barpilots.bsky.social•75 days ago

I agree. Intellectual property owners, artists like yourself and others will probably still get screwed and AI will churn out Muzak versions of original music or poetry or art of any kind

torbjornr.bsky.social•75 days ago

There's a word for things you CANNOT do legally.

I am trying so hard to remember what it is.

You know, when you admit your actions are illegal?

Just can't recall...

caucaphony.bsky.social•75 days ago

I work in AI and for decades we were making very slow progress by not breaking the law. Then the billionaires came along and “disrupted”…

For those decades, we all knew that obviously you could make much more capable AI by stealing masses of data. But that’s not innovation.

paulcameron.bsky.social•75 days ago

Our business couldn’t exist within the current laws and regulations/without underpaying our labour/without destroying the environment.

Ummm…then maybe your business shouldn’t exist?

caledhwa.bsky.social•75 days ago

With a felon president how can any of us think there’s any enforcement left?

gabifox.bsky.social•75 days ago

For millionaires and billionaires, it is common to have lawsuits and large debts without losing a night of sleep. For ordinary people when it comes to money, any debt is always a shadow in our mind.

lids.bsky.social•75 days ago

Your honor it was impossible for me to build this new house without embezzling

annoyance.bsky.social•71 days ago

No it's not. You make a website social media specific to train the AI where people have the forewarning to make the decision instead of taking content from people who don't know

annoyance.bsky.social•71 days ago

Fact of the matter is as much as we all hate twitter now, it having it in the TOS is the correct approach, but it should not be fine print

They just want an excuse to be fucking shity

movingtrainmedia.bsky.social•75 days ago

No chance of that with our Fair and Just™️ legal system.

aangtifa.bsky.social•75 days ago

I'm just thinking about all the people sued by the RIAA for hundreds of thousands of dollars for downloading 14 songs in the 00s for no reason at all.

b3njaminwalker.bsky.social•75 days ago

eruanion.bsky.social•75 days ago

Where are groups like Metallica suing over it?

heyitsmrgraham.bsky.social•75 days ago

OpenAI wouldn't steal a car...

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply