adult-human-male.bsky.social
Editor of the Hebridean Caneware Review.
“The growth of knowledge depends entirely on the existence of a certain kind of doubt.”
– Karl Popper
* Not a real vicar. Bless you anyway 🙏
912 posts
250 followers
982 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
TRAs are the homophobes. Most people who attack them are staunch LGB supporters.
comment in response to
post
Yes I suspect almost no-one believes that claim is anything more than a rhetorical porky
comment in response to
post
But each successive blade shaves a tiny bit closer, until your whiskers are so amazingly short you know you've bought yourself an extra 15 mins pre-shadow chinage.
comment in response to
post
If 'smart people' means biological reality denialists thanks no thanks
comment in response to
post
Had to virtue signal tweet about it though didn't you
comment in response to
post
Those guys are tame compared to steel guys. When you reach welders you're well into Kool Aid territory.
comment in response to
post
Bollocks Guardian is a gender cult cheerleader. Trans women are not demonised they're just being told to stop appropriating women's privileges..
comment in response to
post
She's absolutely right
comment in response to
post
There there Horace. No-one is going to hurt trans people, poppet. Don't believe the haters - trans people are still protected from discrimination and harassment just as they were before.
comment in response to
post
Virtue signalling claptrap.
comment in response to
post
I sat on top or Ularu (before it was closed) and listened to this on my walkman while looking across the vast Australian plane, and it seemed the most perfect match of music and place I'd ever experienced.
comment in response to
post
Let's all just wait till Sunday for some sanity from this account. The Guardian is already a joke but without the Observer would be an irrelevant joke.
comment in response to
post
//squeakinglyjen.bsky.social/post/3lmxb2cvrub2v
comment in response to
post
It's not hostility to trans women, Jennifer, it's hostility to the appropriation of women's privileges and the hollowing out of their rights. And unless you're saying that the Supreme Court's ruling does not matter for women, then you have to accept that the legal actions were not illegitimate.
comment in response to
post
ref //paulrich1978.bsky.social/post/3lmwdhpz3zc24
comment in response to
post
One thing that is clear from your posts today, Paul, is that you 'hate' gender critical people for what they believe, which courts have repeatedly ruled are perfectly legitimate views. So you are in fact guilty of your own thought crime.
This has a name - hypocrisy
comment in response to
post
The problem is that 'hate' against transgender is self-reported, and as you well know they self-report refusal to accept they are what they claim to be. Stonewall used to promote this interpretation until very recently forced to change. So the data is fundamentally flawed.
comment in response to
post
They feel they can say what they want to people who they consider to be morally wrong. And to be fair I don't take offence at pathetic slurs anymore. I take offence at attempts to deprive others of their fundamental rights, such as women and such as people's rights to expression.
comment in response to
post
On balance I'll go with his take. Your post was absurd.
comment in response to
post
No, not because of who they are, but because of the ideology they've been forcing on everyone else for years now.
The resistance to which started to gain a legal basis in 2021 with Maya Forstater.
And which got a MASSIVE boost today.
I'm not sorry for feeling great about this so cry elsewhere.
comment in response to
post
No, not because of who they are, but because of the ideology they've been forcing on everyone else for years now.
The resistance to which started to gain a legal basis in 2021 with Maya Forstater.
And which got a MASSIVE boost today.
I'm not sorry for feeling great about this so cry elsewhere.
comment in response to
post
That's 5 times you've replied to me today, Paul. I'm flattered you're taking such an interest in my timeline, but don't you have something better to do? 😂
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Bore off, Paul
comment in response to
post
Trans rights groups were perfectly able to petition to make submissions to the court, but they clearly chose not to.
comment in response to
post
You lost for a reason - you backed the side trying to bring about a monumental injustice. I suggest you stick to fox population control.
comment in response to
post
💯
comment in response to
post
Ok well according to the article he is "a Parkrun event director"and has been a "run director in Stratford-Upon-Avon on 132 occasions", so fairly happy with my wording
comment in response to
post
This is a job for all historians, politicians and others with interests in human rights. The message of this museum is strongest if they do not seek to step into contemporary politics.
comment in response to
post
You should respect Auschwitz Memorial's mission. The victims of Auschwitz and other camps deserve to be heard about without your shallow moral whataboutery.
comment in response to
post
Good to see this sort of despicable (but sadly all to common behaviour by woke bros like Simon) is getting national press attantion www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/others...
comment in response to
post
Metaphor doesn't aid clarity here I think
comment in response to
post
This is essentially saying that, in social media discourse, the meaning of words is secondary to dunking the other side. I can't get on board with that.
comment in response to
post
The only intolerance is from you.
comment in response to
post
Thank you Alice Sullivan ❤️
comment in response to
post
Cumon, Solomam, do you really want to use a wtf meme where the dude is senior moment regular?
comment in response to
post
The people who want to increase division and mistrust between 'us' and 'them' worry me the most. They're the ones responsible for most human rights violations in history.
comment in response to
post
Not to diminish Michael at all as he is a great guy. But how about a shout out to JK Rowling too for philanthropy that is ~160X more, and ~3X more proportional to wealth?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._K._R...
comment in response to
post
I'm not going to dispute the science denialism of the right and climate change and vaccines. But shall we be objective and discuss the intersectionality of the science denialism of the left?