ahumorlessfem.bsky.social
A humorless feminist. I have no sense of humor, none. Contact: [email protected]
2,208 posts
699 followers
250 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
No, the wives could shoot the masked men
comment in response to
post
Oh if the DNC could have blocked Sanders, it would have.
But they don't run the state elections.
comment in response to
post
No, sorry
comment in response to
post
Cash out your endowment, Harvard.
And you have 1500 eager beaver law students to do the support work for the lawsuits ya cheap bastards.
comment in response to
post
Why people don't look this shit up is beyond me.
It's a quick Google check away!
comment in response to
post
Fair
comment in response to
post
The fact that the terminally online don't understand this basic manipulation is why they never go anywhere.
"Oh but you need to make the plebs understand!" Well, the plebs won't be voting for abstract concepts.
comment in response to
post
To be honest, they are already.
comment in response to
post
Having read history, no.
comment in response to
post
That isn't the point.
THIS is why we have the second. For when a government turns tyrannical and seeks to grab you unlawfully, you can fight back.
It reminds the ICE kidnappers due process protects them as much as us.
comment in response to
post
Barely but at the beginning, yes.
comment in response to
post
Didn't Toad break up right after their second hit?
comment in response to
post
You're a liberal/leftist. You should be better than the rage junkies on the right.
Refusing to check on a full statement makes you disturbingly like those dipshits.
comment in response to
post
If you want to bitch and moan that Democrats aren't doing your pet concern, check to see if the media ignored what was said.
THEN complain on social media.
I know, it's aggravating to have to pause your hit of righteous outrage to see if it is necessary. Do it anyway.
comment in response to
post
Another friendly reminder: media can and often does narrow what they report on.
If Jeffries speaks about due process (which he did, before the economic comments) and the media doesn't cover it (which that outfit didn't), it is not Jeffries fault.
comment in response to
post
I want to!
comment in response to
post
Why? Because I expect people to actually make an attempt to learn anything before spouting off?
comment in response to
post
There's the door. Please let it hit you on the ass as you exit.
comment in response to
post
If you can't be arsed to look up those numbers, I'm not doing it for someone who eagerly consigned millions to death rather than simply going for the sane option.
comment in response to
post
Yes. That was hilarious at the time. Now it’s just heartbreaking.
comment in response to
post
Also, there are multiple genocides going on. What makes Palestinians so special you fail to vote for someone who would try to stop those other genocides rather than inflame and create more?
Hmmm?
comment in response to
post
Voters.
comment in response to
post
It looks like 1976 was the last non-majority government run primaries (wherein secret ballots are used rather than buildings full of people making deals.)
comment in response to
post
Wikipedia has information on every presidential primary going back to the start. You can see how many states switched to government run primaries ages ago.
It's simply a matter of using non-Bernie Stan math.
Oh wait, that's the issue. My bad.
comment in response to
post
That might have been true in 1976, the last time non-primaries were the majority method of picking candidates. Not in 2016 when there were only 18 caucuses remaining.
I know y'all believe that backroom dealing wrecked your boy. But he lost because Democratic voters rejected him. Not party officials.
comment in response to
post
No, this one is strictly on voters.
If your choice is a sane person who you can persuade to support your policy preferences or a dementia-addled incompetent fascist, you don't refuse to vote for the former because of a tiny fraction of the planet.
comment in response to
post
It also can call on over 3K lawyers to come defend it.
comment in response to
post
Harvard also has an endowment of over $50B
It also probably could get another $200B fairly quickly. After all, the university has a lot of vastly wealthy alumni.
It can afford, in every way, to tell Trump to fuck off.
comment in response to
post
Harvard is old money.
The Trumps are no different than the families desperately trying to join the Astor 400 in the 1880s to 1910s.
comment in response to
post
Change takes time and exposure to alternate viewpoints.
I expect her to stay right wing for the most part for at least a decade.
comment in response to
post
To get her to change.
comment in response to
post
Wait, isn't she playing oppression olympics by insisting her group is super duper oppressed compared to Black Americans?
comment in response to
post
Elizabeth Warren, TO HER CREDIT, admitted it was wrong of her to cast stones at Hillary Clinton once Warren became a Senator. She realized how fucking hard it is to improve things.
I am not the biggest fan of Warren but at least she can learn.
comment in response to
post
If you wonder why I despise people like Sanders? Side benchers who couldn't be bothered to do the extremely hard work of pushing anything forward yet constantly claim they are somehow better?
That's why.
comment in response to
post
There are a lot of people who would have simply retreated after the loss she suffered over her effort to get health care access passed.
She didn't.
Yet guess who got hatred thrown her way by a guy who never did fuck all?
comment in response to
post
For instance, Hillary Clinton swallowed her pride, ignored the hatred thrown her and Bill's way in the mid-1990s to get SCHIP passed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childre...
comment in response to
post
In 1932 to 1941? That was when money's power was at its lowest ebb in the US. The fact that your ignorant ass doesn't know that doesn't surprise me.
Bothering to learn about what happened *during* the Great Depression is something twerps like you are too incompetent to do.
comment in response to
post
By the way, Blaise, that includes you thinking the mind-bogglingly stupid idea that FDR or the United States government from 1932 to 1941 was ever in support of Hitler.
Go read These Angry Days and slink back to the slime pit you slithered out from.
comment in response to
post
Yes, it's depressing
comment in response to
post
I know. It's still fascinating.
comment in response to
post
Fucking for guns is a fascinating method.