amiserablerabbit.bsky.social
artist. machine. sick creature.
🌟
I don't use pronouns online but you can use e/em or he/him idk
🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
753 posts
245 followers
551 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I also have the word "TRASH" on my R knee, the alchemical symbol for earth (🜃) on my R outer knee. I've been meaning to put the one for air (🜁) on my L outer knee.
Now you can identify my body 🤷♂️
comment in response to
post
* i currently have my lobes pierced once each (L 0g, R 4g), I uh, have a PA (12g), and I used to have lip rings (12g) which one I kept longer than the other. Both fell out by accident.
I have a nib on my L thumb, a rabbit homage to Miffy on my R; an ankh (𓋹) on my L ankle, an agliz (ᛉ) on my R.
comment in response to
post
"...Dot playing the woman in the overcoat was a natural, if somewhat controversial choice..."
comment in response to
post
Don't let them erase Marsha, erase Sylvia, erase all of us, our history, our culture, our presence, our dignity, our humanity.
comment in response to
post
I, actually, do not defend your right to free speech: there's a motherfucking nazi in this god damn bar and every minute longer is one more minute this is now "a nazi bar". Thanks for labeling the trash, now let's put it in it's place.
comment in response to
post
I'll strip the humanity right off them, because, frankly, I do not see them as worthwhile members of society. And if every time I have to endure the gun pointed at me, at you, at everyone else, then god damn so should they.
comment in response to
post
Guess what, buck-o? You're a subliterate subhuman and no one wants to give your odious ass a job, which you neither deserve nor can perform. You were meant to be fertilizer. Worm food. You are garbage on two legs. I will not reason with a terrorist, which you are, and a bootlicker, as well.
comment in response to
post
You're the one who literally said that women are whores and men are the default gender. And yes you did. Don't be obtuse. Whining like a baby sitting in your own shit only works on your mother, you understand perfectly what is happening and perfectly how you are twisting the intent to whine
comment in response to
post
Isn't that what taking over the Kennedy Center is about, tho?
I mean they don't care about the talent, they think we're all here because of "quotas" bc they don't understand what the initiatives actually /do/.
They are erasing us from culture completely.
comment in response to
post
This one's my ode to Prince Valient.
comment in response to
post
Two right-to-left comics, practically a senien manga here up. Also it's all gay.
comment in response to
post
Anyway I have a disordered emotional framework and, honestly, I am still alive, so idk like maybe we don't need saucy little comics about how mean!1 it is to ever speak to an artist like they didn't invent OCs from whole cloth.
comment in response to
post
Nothing you can do but shrug, feel the comparison is, at best, incidental, and keep making stuff.
Now, sure, if it gets to be like, the only thing ppl WILL say about it.... well, maybe you just have to learn to live with that.
comment in response to
post
Yeah I get it, the gut reaction to not being the first to ever have a cool thought and to have gotten there without any outside input of what that thought "should" look like feels embarrassing and icky and you want to yell and scream and claw at the offensive comments' face. But it in what it is.
comment in response to
post
The amount of ways to mark the paper to render an image that is recognizable as a bird has a Knowable number (it's just unknown).
This isn't to say that you can't get to the same end with a wide variation of *how* the bird is rendered. Just that you will, inevitably, make a mark someone else did.
comment in response to
post
There are only ever gonna be so many physical atoms that make up substances that construct to your art material which in and of it's self has a limited capacity for how you can render the works from it: there is, in fact, a finite number of ways you can mark the paper. Even finer still:
comment in response to
post
Not that I expect everyone to just KNOW ALL ART, but you should at least be able to understand that a significant figure might have subconsciously influenced you, or even been a conscious influence for one of *your* influences. I mean like, we are all working with the same base materials.
comment in response to
post
But also...I don't think it's a real brag to say "I am wholy unfamiliar and completely uninspired by (Popular Media) (Known Artist) (Specific Technique to a Craft)" it just...sounds ignorant.
comment in response to
post
Unless it's actually an accusation, it doesn't need to be treated as one.
I kinda wish we as artists didn't always put our pride about it first. In marketing, instantly getting the attention from completely left field would be a good thing lol.
comment in response to
post
Also, js, you (the artist, general) are also the one choosing to get mad or sad or blow up at a person who only has one point of reference.
Like, you were never in an anabolic chamber before this day. It might feel annoying but also you might just have caught the zeitgeist.
comment in response to
post
As I sell you some overpriced luxury commodity on a wage that makes other people who consider themselves "a professional industry" strike. And that's food service in a nutshell, baby.
comment in response to
post
But also realistically, speaking for myself, I am only lucky to not be a seasonal picker (tho i've applied, but, of course that's theatre), and spend more of my time watching with amazement how quickly people trust the nearly-meaningless words on the package or believe the corporate shill,
comment in response to
post
And, realistically, people like me get paid a pittance to align the copytext onto the proprietary graphic and maybe if we are very very lucky we can storyboard a joke where a pig happily sells you it's own chops as long as the censors and advertisers don't complain about it being too thinly veild.
comment in response to
post
And then a bigger company with richer owners TEChICHllY owns the farm but not LEGalLY is the owner, and they end up buying off a state representative of hundred few while the government appointed advisory boards have no funds and no staff to oversee the largest Funny Animal factory farm.