barrybista.bsky.social
74 posts
23 followers
66 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
He should be fined bigly and lose his drivers license for a year
But it’s not as if he obstructed an official proceeding like Al did
Weak presidents will lock you in solitary 3 years for doing that
comment in response to
post
No
Republicans don’t let ads on Facebook change who they’re voting for.
Newsom will have to convince dems he’s going to do something different from the previous failures if he wants to win.
comment in response to
post
The dems behaved like good little boys and girls after that one guy got tossed out early
Very demur….
Very mindful…..
The guy who got booted was lucky that’s all he got
Weak presidents lock people in solitary for 3 years for obstructing an official proceeding
comment in response to
post
If he convinces enough dems to give up their illegals and stop forcing women to let men in their locker rooms then this guy just might be president in a few years.
comment in response to
post
Article 2 is clear
Congress has several ✅/⚖️ over the executive branch:
Reject overall budget
Reject appointments
Reject treaties
Override vetoes
Impeachment
But they cant dictate how the Chief Executive controls agencies under the Executive Branch
That includes hiring & firing within agencies
comment in response to
post
Congress establishes the post office and the army and the navy and a multitude of other organizations.
But the control of all these agencies under the executive branch rests with the chief executive.
I wonder when SCOTUS will make it official?
comment in response to
post
Fined him bigly and take away his drivers license for a year.
But it’s not like he obstructed an official proceeding and had to be booted out.
That’s the sort of thing weak presidents put you in 3 years of solitary for, lol.
comment in response to
post
Where in the constitution is the post office declared to be “independent” of the executive Branch?
comment in response to
post
Executive Branch agencies like the post office are under the control of the Chief Executive not the legislature.
comment in response to
post
Nope
The only legitimate reasons for asylum are
Persecution due to:
Race
Religion
Nationality
Political opinion
Social Group
Poverty and Crime are not reasons for asylum
So unless they’re all gay, they’re frauds, lol
comment in response to
post
ICE is rounding up illegals…
Remind me again
Is ICE the same as the NRCC?
comment in response to
post
It’ll make a nice picture, right?
comment in response to
post
Presidents aren’t prisoners.
They come and go as they please, lol
comment in response to
post
SCOTUS has not “ruled” on anything.
They declined to intervene in a case that isn’t they’re yet
See the difference, lol?
comment in response to
post
Zelenskyy sent Trump a letter that he was ready to come crawling back to beg for another handout from a strong leader.
But he hasn’t apologized yet……
I think we’ll stop the handouts until he does.
He’ll need to beg much better than he has so far, lol .
comment in response to
post
It’s every Americans right to file a frivolous lawsuit, lol
comment in response to
post
Sure…. Critical thinking comes in in handy in the heart attack business, lol
comment in response to
post
Most of the frivolous lawsuits center around this one issue.
When one falls
They all fall.
Weird, huh?
It’s almost if it was planned that way
comment in response to
post
Nothing in Article2 suggests that POTUS needs permission of Congress to use the powers granted to him by the constitution
That’s how Carter was able to create the ED DEPT
If only there was some way to get SCOTUS to interpret it and settle the issue once and for all
Maybe a lower court/EO lawsuit
comment in response to
post
Congress has several ✅/⚖️ over the executive branch:
Reject overall budget
Reject appointments
Reject treaties
Override vetoes
Impeachment
But they cant dictate how the Chief Executive controls the executive branch
That includes hiring & firing within agencies and creating & closing agencies
comment in response to
post
The demmies behaved like good little boys and girls after that one guy got kicked out early
Very demur….
Very mindful…..
The guy who got tossed was lucky that’s all he got
Some presidents lock people in solitary for 3 years for obstructing an official proceeding.
comment in response to
post
The Dems behaved like good little boys and girls after that one guy got kicked out
Very demur
Very mindful
The guy who got tossed was lucky that’s all he got
Some presidents lock people in solitary for 3 years for obstructing an official proceeding.
comment in response to
post
Too bad #StutteringJoe killed all the chickens before he got fired.
comment in response to
post
Obstructing an official proceeding……
That’s 3 years in solitary under some presidents
comment in response to
post
Article 2 gives the chief executive control of the executive branch.
Judges can’t change that
Senators can’t change that
Only an amendment can change that.
Every American who took civics in the 8th grade knows that
comment in response to
post
Russia, lol
comment in response to
post
Article 2 gives the chief executive control of the executive branch.
Judges can’t change that
Senators can’t change that
Only an amendment can change that.
comment in response to
post
I am Self employed
And I work way to hard to have bureaucrats waste my tax dollars on non essentials
comment in response to
post
Russia, lol
comment in response to
post
Lower courts losses lead the way to SCOTUS reversals.
This is how Trump allows them establish once and for all that POTUS controls all aspects of the executive branch
I wonder why no other president ever thought of it before
comment in response to
post
“Close enough for government work”
-2024 civil servant
“How may I help you quickly, you are my highest priority”
-2025 civil servant
See the difference that firing a few non essentials can make?
People work harder when they know performance matters and they don’t have a ‘job fur life’ after all
comment in response to
post
Most people aren’t even prosecuted for minor paperwork misdemeanors, lol
People who matter didn’t care at all did they?
comment in response to
post
Helping the enemy in any way during a national emergency is treason, lol
comment in response to
post
Isn’t that the official language of the USA, lol?
comment in response to
post
Refusing to stand for a little boy with brain cancer
Hard to come back from that
comment in response to
post
I Don’t recall
comment in response to
post
Nah. They’re selling it out of the closet, lol
It’s a little cowardly but it makes for a good photo op, huh?
comment in response to
post
Crossing the border illegally is the only crime need for deportation.
comment in response to
post
SCOTUS declined to intervene in a case that’s almost over.
You know the appeal is coming, right, lol?
comment in response to
post
It looks like they’re just selling booze out of a closet now, lol
comment in response to
post
It appears that the only thing that was done is moving the booze off the shelf and into a closet.
What stops them from selling out of the closet?
comment in response to
post
The question was whether or not the booze is destroyed
If not, then it seems like nothing more than a petulant temper tantrum with no real consequences for their photo op
comment in response to
post
Are they destroying the already purchased booze they’ve confiscated from the store owners?
Or just putting it in storage as part of an elaborate deception?
comment in response to
post
Sorry….. wasn’t clear
What happens if the store owner doesn’t comply with the directors order?
Does he go to jail for smuggling?
comment in response to
post
The official language of the USA Is English
comment in response to
post
What happens if someone refuses to comply with the order to stop buying bourbon?
Jail?
comment in response to
post
If not jail, is there a small fine, lol?
comment in response to
post
That’s nothing new.
Nazis always thought Americans were
Deplorable
So do Iranians, lol
comment in response to
post
Odd how one guy can dictate to others which booze to buy.
We don’t have anything like that here
What happens if people refuse to comply?
Jail?
comment in response to
post
That’s not what the video shows.
There’s no ban on buying American booze, lol