enormo.bsky.social
Europeans unite!
66 posts
12 followers
9 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
"The Socialist chancellor’s comments[...]"
I think you got the label wrong. Social Democrats and Socialists are not the same.
comment in response to
post
Tut mir Leid, hatte es als rhetorische Frage und double down auf den Ausgangspost aufgefasst. Mein Fehler
comment in response to
post
Und jetzt? Alle Männer abschieben? Kommt mir bekannt vor diese Feindbildpflege und dient einzig der Spalterei. Abgesehen davon hast du kein relevantes n um hier überhaupt Schlüsse zu ziehen.
comment in response to
post
Verallgemeinerung, hilfreich. Das gleiche macht die rechte Bubble in Bezug auf ein anderes Merkmal des Täters.
comment in response to
post
Da liegt aber der Unterschied. In der Wissenschaft wird ein theoretischer Wissensschatz zur Verfügung gestellt, der der Prüfung standgehalten hat (Homöopathie gehört nicht dazu). Neue Erkenntnisse können diesen Stand ändern. Nur Glaube liefert ein unumstößliches Fundament das man zu akzeptieren hat.
comment in response to
post
Wissenschaft bar jedweder Ethik ist aber auch kein populärer Standpunkt. Mir ging es darum, dass Wissenschaft kein Glaube ist.
comment in response to
post
Don't have X anymore so I can't read the whole statement but the first claim is already false as EnBW clearly stated it's not feasible for them to go back to nuclear. Also, Cicero is not considered neutral press so be careful to validate info coming from them as they tend to spin things a little.
comment in response to
post
I hope so too, for you and me both and for humanity.
comment in response to
post
"as long as we don't make sure that every person has a decent life, I have no faith in mankind." - Erwin Maas
Maybe take some notes from your own profile before putting tweets devoid of empathy into the world.
comment in response to
post
We need a sense of unity in the EU. Trump once more demonstrated to the world that fear and hate wins elections and I'm afraid this will facilitate rise of far-right movements around the globe even more. If "our country first" sentiment spreads, a shift in world order towards Ch and Ru is inevitable
comment in response to
post
In all fairness, Russia is vile and rotten to the core. In case of US I want to believe that they are in a deep identity crisis and many citizens seem to lack geopolitical awareness. But I agree that EU needs to grow up fast and emancipate from both. Sadly populism is strong in times of crisis.
comment in response to
post
What an incredibly shitty, uneducated and heartless take. So Putins plan all along was to make some money for the international industrial-military complex? The US as well as Russia (and UK) guaranteed sovereignty to Ukraine in exchange for their nuclear arsenal and no they get f* by both.
comment in response to
post
It is incredibly disappointing what became of the USA. Milk and eggs get a little more expensive and they have no interest in a union of western values anymore and throw Ukraine to the dogs. I really hope the EU manages to compensate their failure and learns that neither Russia nor USA are reliable.
comment in response to
post
You so desperately want me to be against nuclear it's almost funny. Read the article, operator states it clear as day. Guess we will see at latest as Gov changes. Have a good one.
comment in response to
post
The operator states deconstruction is irreversible, that has nothing to do with a political party, sorry.
comment in response to
post
Seems like your info is outdated:
bsky.app/profile/tage...
Just yesterday EnBW declared that the deconstruction is irreversible and building new plants would take a decade at best. And once again, I am not anti-nuclear so you don't have to convince me with your agenda. But it wont happen for Germany
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/tage...
Ehrliche Frage, ändert das etwas an deiner Einschätzung?
comment in response to
post
Wenn du weiter als die Überschrift gelesen hättest, wüßtest du die Antwort. Steht bereits direkt im Vorspann: "Die Außenminister des Bündnisses beraten heute über Abwehrstrategien - und mögliche Gegenschläge."
comment in response to
post
Verstehe nicht, wie diese Positionierung des Betreibers mit Vorurteilen in Verbindung steht. Der Rückbau bestehender AKW ist irreversibel, der Bau neuer dauert im besten Fall eine Dekade. Das sind doch klare Fakten, oder nicht?
comment in response to
post
I mean that without guarantees Putin will break a ceasefire as soon as it fits him. Everything you propose boils down to trusting that Putin negotiates. I don't have any intel supporting this hope. And in case he doesn't, what is your plan B?
comment in response to
post
Catalyzing this decline to actually force Putin to negotiate is the best option imo. But we are failing at that and now we have to hope that Putin is willing to negotiate and that Trump will manage to get a fair deal for Ukraine. But as long as Putin is unwilling I say give Ukraine everything. 2/2
comment in response to
post
Its not ambitious its delusional. A ceasefire without NATO membership would be pointless though. Best alternative would have been full-hearted support of Ukraine when they stood a real chance. This war is very expensive for Putin. economy, demography, reputation all went down the shitter.1/2
comment in response to
post
And Putin sure as hell wont agree to a ceasefire if it means what remains of Ukraine joins the NATO. In fact he stated NATO membership of Ukraine is a red line. so what is your strategy if he wont make concessions or if just isn't open for negotiation as has been the case for the last 3 years? 2/2
comment in response to
post
Because Scholz, Biden and Macron repeatedly tried to negotiate with Putin, both, before he raided Ukraine and afterwards with no results at all. He isn't even considering Germany a serious negotiation partner (he might be right on that one). 1/2
comment in response to
post
So you would drop weapon delivery altogether to force Ukraine into forfeit? As a pacifist, do you think its justifiable to let something like Bucha happen again? What if Putin is not willing to make concessions or just goes on with his raid? there is no sign of him being willing to negotiate.
comment in response to
post
Of course it is a conspiracy when you say that parties in support of Ukraine are just pushing lobby agenda, Jesus. So you are against weapon delivery to Ukraine?
comment in response to
post
So parties supporting Ukraine are just lobbying for the military complex? That is a bit one-sided don't you think? Especially since we also have BSW that is directly reiterating Kreml Propaganda and the current head of SPD also seems very keen on cozying up to Putin.
comment in response to
post
it just sickens me that western security guarantees apparently are worthless and that we somehow "escalate" things. F* that narrative, its just cowardice paired with hypocrisy. And Scholz patting his own back every opportunity for the measly support we give is so tiring and embarrassing. 2/2
comment in response to
post
Now it might be too late as Ukraine ran out of soldiers due to insufficient military aid. But had we equipped them sooner they might have brought themselves into a much better position for negotiations. Why are you trying to impose an ideology onto me? Never said anything about migrants/ps. 1/2
comment in response to
post
Of course not but you would have to adress this to russia as they started the war and are responsible for the horrible loss of human life, both of soldiers and civilians, as well as destruction of thousands of homes.
comment in response to
post
On the russian side for sure. Your assumption implicates that Putin is holding back which i find unlikely due do him having to hire soldiers from NK to defend his own territory.
comment in response to
post
In that regard I find it cynical to talk about "de-escalation" when what is means is looking the other way and let Putin get on with it. Had we given Ukraine the necessary support from the beginning they could go into real negotiations. Now its not even clear if Putin is going to take a deal at all.
comment in response to
post
Depends on what you mean by de-escalation. The Budapest Memorandum hat the goal to deescalate. in its course Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons and in return was guaranteed independence and sovereignty. The signee that got the nukes now raided Ukraine while the others hold back on assured support. 1/2
comment in response to
post
He ran out of options. Ukraine is lacking soldiers and it remains to be seen if Putin will take any deal while he in position of power. If we, as the West, had provided Ukraine with the necessary support that we had contractually assured them, Ukraine would be in a different situation entirely today
comment in response to
post
Most recent survey shows only 39% of Germans want Taurus to be delivered so denying it is likely benefitting Scholz. I never said Taurus would de-escalate or that opposing its delivery was populist. Still think it would have been the right thing to do though.
comment in response to
post
Sadly the majority in Germany is against delivery of Taurus so its quite possible electoral. As a German this is deeply frustrating but we have two very successful populist parties that push Putins agenda of fear.
comment in response to
post
He is forced to negotiate as Trump will spit on the Budapest Memorandum as Putin already did. Imagine giving up nuclear weapons to be guaranteed independence and sovereignty within existing borders and then being raided by the country that took the nukes while the other parties hold back on support.
comment in response to
post
There would have been a lot more diplomatic elbow grease necessary. Putin is not willing to talk security guarantees for Ukraine now and he wasn't then. And this was closely followed by the Bucha massacre for which Putin gave medals to the war criminals responsible which did not help the matter.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, same here. It appears we was not here to have a discussion but to push narrative.
comment in response to
post
Adding to that, the negotiations offered no solution for security guarantees or territorial compromises. In other words, the critical issues remained unresolved and it's naive to belive Russia would have made significant concessions. It remains a commonly progapated Kreml narrative though.
comment in response to
post
Starkes Interview!
comment in response to
post
So you just straight up ignore the technical and legal reasons why it's not going to happen? Also, I am not against NP, in fact I already stated it would have been the superior choice over coal years ago. But at this point in time it's too late and expensive to rebuild.
comment in response to
post
Also it is not about fear of NPPs. Germany had major issues finding a safe storage for the waste. A former salt mine was leaky which resulted in a very expensive relocation which is also only temporary. This combined with Fukushima made NP very unpopular so conservatives decided the final exit.
comment in response to
post
And even if they could be rebuild and adapted to modern standards in only a few years time those 3 plants only provided 6%. Also new gov is unlikely to build new ones as no provider wants to build/run them due to legal f up and the uncertain runtime. 2/2
comment in response to
post
Sorry but you have to catch up on the NPP situation in Ger. The whole nuclear exit was a legal disaster for both, state and providers. there was an exit from the exit and then an exit from that. only 3 plants were functional in the end and even those are under deconstruction since April 2023. 1/2
comment in response to
post
What do you mean 60% was the cheap part? Gas is not considered renewable. Sorry I don't get your point here.
And where do you get the information that the closed NPPs could be restarted for cents? 1. They are outdated 2. no fuel and 3. providers don't want to operate them anymore for several reasons
comment in response to
post
Germany is at over 60% renewables with an increase of 20% over the last 5 years, aiming for 80% till 2030. Nuclear power plants are outdated and shut down, renewal and construction of new ones to have sufficient impact can take year to decades. So its useless short term and very expensive to rebuild
comment in response to
post
Have to agree here. Would have been better years ago to go for nuclear power over coal transitionally. But now it would take years and insane amounts of money to get nuclear going again. Renewables is the way to go to be independent of countries providing fuel resources.
comment in response to
post
True. Propagation of christian fundamentalism in the US went completely haywire. But in the EU it's usually not a topic that wins you elections. Or at least that's what I thought.
comment in response to
post
Fair. But "the only real science is Jesus Christ" is something I don't hear from far-right politicians in the EU (yet). The populist approach usually is to appeal to a broad mass using fears and emotions while staying vague. It's alarming that fundamentalistic rejection of science gets a majority.