flguy79.bsky.social
Dad, grandfather; mostly-retired lawyer; farmer; Red Sox fan; U.S. Army Vietnam veteran. Supporter of Ukraine. Concerned about climate change, human population growth, power of billionaires as a danger to democracy.
104 posts
8 followers
28 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
lent
comment in response to
post
Hiding it from the public
comment in response to
post
If this doesn't make it onto network TV without bleeps, it is journalistic malpractice and a coverup.
comment in response to
post
More importantly, did he consult Laura Loomer?
comment in response to
post
I'm not at all surprised. Do schools even teach geography any more?
comment in response to
post
Not really a correct statement. Demented Trump announced that it was an agreement with the EU while standing beside Starmer.
comment in response to
post
What he says was the reason is not necessarily the actual reason. I think it's because meeting with Zelensky would bring more attention on how he has failed Ukraine.
comment in response to
post
If it's a good idea, why wait 2 years?
comment in response to
post
She's just thanking the officers? I know she sounds drunk, but ...
comment in response to
post
Just out for a stroll. Not music to march to anyway. Guess whoever is in charge never heard of John Philips Sousa.
comment in response to
post
Finally some pics of the suspect. They should have been all over the place hours ago.
comment in response to
post
The shootings in Minnesota are interfering with his face time.
comment in response to
post
None of the videos of the fall are working. How did that happen?
comment in response to
post
Why are these clips not working?
comment in response to
post
Honest question: Has Trump ever had a genuine friend?
comment in response to
post
Does he have an opponent yet for 2026? If so, I'd like to contribute.
comment in response to
post
Trump will direct settlement with them for a couple of mil apiece, increasing the national debt by that amount.
comment in response to
post
Gotta give Elon credit here. He's a master at burning bridges.
comment in response to
post
Putin will advise Trump to have Elon's plane shot down.
comment in response to
post
That's a little better than his last attempt.
comment in response to
post
But it may not show up in the US numbers because Trump is already making personnel changes in order to manipulate those numbers.
comment in response to
post
He richly deserves mental anguish. I hope it's true.
comment in response to
post
Who is saying this?
comment in response to
post
Based on his social media posts he seems to have emotional overload just about every day.
comment in response to
post
Should have happened a long time ago.
comment in response to
post
Just thinking it might be a good idea to explain what the Emerson Collective is in an article like this. I've never heard of it.
comment in response to
post
He'll snag a pardon before Jan 2029 for sure
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately they'll all be pardoned by Trump or Vance.
comment in response to
post
He just gave the UK tremendous leverage in negotiating all the details.
comment in response to
post
Why are you showing a photo of 2 women without identifying which one is the nominee?
comment in response to
post
That's pretty funny!
comment in response to
post
Maybe he's telling us he's ready for better competition.
comment in response to
post
If you had followed her stint as FL AG you'd be more prepared for this. Don't understand how she ever passed a bar exam.
comment in response to
post
But won't crystal balls work?
comment in response to
post
If you're not already a contributor I'm not interested in hearing your complaints.
comment in response to
post
Directors whose terms have expired without a replacement having been confirmed continue in office only until the end of the calendar year in which their term expired.
comment in response to
post
The statute does expressly provide that directors, officers and employees are not governmental office holders.
comment in response to
post
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is actually "a private company" in name only. Created by statute (47 USC s. 396), its directors are nominated by the President, subject to Senate confirmation, for nominally 6-year terms that don't expire until a successor is confirmed.
comment in response to
post
Nothing about victory day in the Civil War? Hmm.
comment in response to
post
What's wrong with the old one? Not enough gold shit? How much will it cost?
comment in response to
post
I think his main qualification for anything is being a Bill Belichick lookalike. It hits me every time I see a photo of him.
comment in response to
post
Who are the people in camo behind them?
comment in response to
post
Stripped down to its basics, this is a governmental attempt to suppress freedom of speech in order to hide unfavorable facts from the public.
comment in response to
post
led
comment in response to
post
And bring in more amateurs. That's worked astonishingly well so far.
comment in response to
post
I refuse to subscribe to the WSJ. None of my $ going in Rupert Murdoch's direction.
comment in response to
post
It's amazing she ever passed a bar exam. Maybe she used the Trump SAT method.
comment in response to
post
Also ABC/WaPo.
comment in response to
post
The Times better watch out or Elon will buy it.
comment in response to
post
Also she's the lightest of legal lightweights ever to occupy the office.