jcar8mm.bsky.social
67 posts
28 followers
312 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Thought the same thing.
comment in response to
post
I’m through with Ari Melber. He’d have Hitler on for his opinions if he could, and then say, “We wanna cover all sides here, folks.”
comment in response to
post
Remember that “never trust a man with three names” line?
comment in response to
post
The York part came from the city. That’s how he got the name.
comment in response to
post
I think it was named after the original York.
comment in response to
post
They’re never swing voters. Always shills.
comment in response to
post
Yep. They won’t even give you partial months.
comment in response to
post
It’s from the FOX News cartoon version of the Left. And unfortunately, it works.
comment in response to
post
75-76. We had Jerry Brown in office, Nixon out, and Carter on the way. There was lots of hope in the air — like the hippies had made a mark somehow and the pursuit of peace and love meant something. Plus, no computers yet, or billionaires.
comment in response to
post
If it were Cuomo, the guy would have been out long, long ago.
comment in response to
post
It’s a gag gift. Not serious.
comment in response to
post
It’s a gag gift from a couple of years ago that makes fun of the idea. It’s not real.
comment in response to
post
It was a gag gift. Not real.
comment in response to
post
Yes— it was a gag gift from three years ago.
comment in response to
post
The real Man Fork (also at Amazon) only has four tines. It’s just a big fork. Where did this monstrous version come from? I suspect it’s just satirical in intent.
comment in response to
post
You sure this didn’t start off as a joke? I say this because their order page clearly seems tongue in cheek.
comment in response to
post
Sounds very much like AI.
comment in response to
post
Bummer. There was always hope.
comment in response to
post
Do you think the tiny print was intentional? You can barely see it.
comment in response to
post
The GOP finally got their line item veto, yes.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, and in a pretty brilliant way. A lot of artists and creative types still use Yahoo.
comment in response to
post
Big basic problem you’re right. Cultural criticism — like what we had in the 60s and 70s — has all but disappeared. Now apparently this is the Best of All Possible Worlds.
comment in response to
post
Howdy!
comment in response to
post
Maybe Trump and the GOP will be open to a simple trade of California?
comment in response to
post
Can you imagine what would have happened if Biden had ignored that court decision?
comment in response to
post
They’re going after liberal programs. Republicans have always wanted a line item veto, and now they’ve got it.
comment in response to
post
It’s also much more of an effort to line-item-veto progressive programs than it is “budget cutting.” That’s why no one in the GOP will say anything- they love it.
comment in response to
post
She was actually quite good — she’d be an improvement over him.
comment in response to
post
A document that is watermarked by someone else doesn’t look official or reliable. They may not be anyway, but a watermark shows that someone else’s fingerprints have been on it. Why do it when most people don’t?
comment in response to
post
It can lead to confusion, like, maybe I’m reading a purloined document or something. You know, like where did this come from and is it legit/complete?
comment in response to
post
You’re a little late.
comment in response to
post
Extra Amtrak funding is one of the few areas of agreement in this Congress. There will be hell to pay in these districts.
comment in response to
post
It takes more than that, and the numbers are next to nothing.
comment in response to
post
Go back to X
comment in response to
post
And the DC attorney thanking him back and saying he’ll look into it (!)
comment in response to
post
I’ll bet a good number of those are about ready to retire soon anyway.
comment in response to
post
I think that’s their goal.
comment in response to
post
How awful. Wonder who’s behind it.
It might also be illegal to do to people who are not public figures and have not given out any private information.
comment in response to
post
Are they getting hearings ahead of this?
comment in response to
post
Most don’t sell much seed anymore in America if even any at all.
comment in response to
post
Maybe because they don’t have yards because houses are now $1.1 million if you’re lucky enough to find one…?
comment in response to
post
Wrong Digby.
comment in response to
post
And on top of the tariff, the middlemen always take an extra cut too.
comment in response to
post
People were far more aware of this past in the 60s and 70s. The idiocy started later, with Reagan.
comment in response to
post
It used to be like that. No lie.
comment in response to
post
The grandparents were quite liberal. One of the problems now is that so many of the progressive boomers are no longer around.
comment in response to
post
It’s not just white people.
comment in response to
post
I hate to sound like a boomer, but we were a far better country back then socially, culturally, and morally. I’m talking about the early middle 70s, an era that was at least as woke as now.
comment in response to
post
It’s just too much. Is there any mechanism to address this insanity?
comment in response to
post
Most of them voted for him.