lipstickscribbles.bsky.social
It's been a long, winding journey, cutting a path through uncharted territory.
861 posts
36 followers
12 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Waiting for the response:
*Issued a bench warrant for your ass
comment in response to
post
When you open up cost plus diagnosis,b you'll have two of the pieces.
comment in response to
post
I think we can all get behind a #rockanazi program.
comment in response to
post
Professional shit swallower discovers they don't like the taste.
comment in response to
post
Mushroom cloud went up blocks away when a kid.
Genius went to bleed off his large outdoor propane tank while smoking.
Blew his roof off the house, neighbors windows out.
Dropped his carport on his Corvette.
Flash fried his dog.
He landed in his pool and survived.
Trump in a nutshell.
comment in response to
post
It's not that some of us don't believe these countries can negotiate. It's that we're burning all our goodwill, and you've sold businesses Mark, you ought to know what the value of goodwill is.
You don't set it on fire unless you don't want a future business or country anyone values.
comment in response to
post
Never trust a bullshitter/junkie.
Lol, there's zero reason for Z to sign and exactly no way for the US to enforce unilateral behavior in Ukraine.
news.sky.com/story/zelens...
comment in response to
post
The horseshoe theory has come full circle with the far right destroying American power almost exactly like the far left fantasied about.
comment in response to
post
I can think of a couple Afrikaners we could add to the total.
comment in response to
post
I would have said staggering stupidity.
comment in response to
post
Also, CEE countries line up with us because we stood by them as they went through decades post Soviet sphere and finally came out better.
None of us want them to look at us like they do the Russians, cause that hate burns deep, for very good reasons.
comment in response to
post
Holding a gun to Ukraine when we a) don't need to, and b) won't solve a true REE problem anyhow (be on the literal front line in any conflict)
It's bad form and bad diplomacy.
comment in response to
post
You want to jump start rare earth refining, slap tariffs on them.
When US slapped tariffs on steel, US producers raised prices. Then they went on spending spree building facilities.
Friends designed those expansions.
comment in response to
post
US Govt was already funding US based refining being built here. Again, lag is permitting because of chem processes (and ultimately needing to turn profit).
comment in response to
post
Please, stop reposting Quora answers.
Decades are because of permits in the US, not physics of mining or infra.
Rare earth mines are open pit (shit is literally in all of the earth crust). The equipment is mobile.
Go visit Milwaukee and see some real Komatsu mining equipment.
comment in response to
post
I see we're in the phase of replacing civil engineering and aeronautical science degree holding leaders with economics students (aka basket weaving).
comment in response to
post
He's got the word salad part down, or perhaps he grok3d it?
comment in response to
post
News at 11: Angry drunk is angry.
comment in response to
post
Trump is throwing that away, for nothing in return.
Not peace.
Not strength.
And certainly not the betterment of other peoples than himself.
comment in response to
post
One of the strengths, imo, of US imperialism is it renews itself and changes as immigrants join and are accepted into this country because it has too.
That's how, I believe we have seen that it can respond to criticism, rebalance itself, and allow for growing freedom of allies.
comment in response to
post
He's making a tired, bad faith argument that sans US imperialism (which has, factually, bouts of trying to be self improve over time) the forces that fill that vacuum would be better suited to a given region.
That is a 10,000lb argument hanging from a gossamer thread of belief.
comment in response to
post
I love the fact that he thinks Twitter runs fine.
comment in response to
post
Isn't that what Advisory Councils were supposed to be for?
comment in response to
post
Sprinkle a shit sandwich with gold flakes, it's still a shit sandwich. Willing to seed future Ukrainian hatred before we even reap the goodwill harvest from this?
Trump is snatching defeat from the jaws of victory on so many levels.
Just another moral bankruptcy for him, but we're on the hook.
comment in response to
post
If you're a smaller country and your options are being Russian cannon fodder, or beggared by China debt, why aren't you allowed the freedom to associate with the US if you perceive that to be in your best interests?
Anti-agency under the guise of anti-imperialism is just as abjectly self serving.
comment in response to
post
EA, earn to give, all premised on the "I know better" umbrella.
One and the same codex for "I want to do what I want to do with as much money as possible and fuck everyone else".
comment in response to
post
Community of One problems.
comment in response to
post
Looks like we got some Cotton Cartel problems in Alabama.
Better send in the feds.
comment in response to
post
What's the deadpool Trump approval number where the GOP finds a spine?
comment in response to
post
Also agree, the benefits of pseudo monopoly clearly weigh in our favor. Why breaching that trust reads nth order stupid.
I just don't think pinky promising not to cheat again is going to work.
comment in response to
post
I agree I wouldn't expect a breakout in 4 years to happen, but if I've essentially contracted with the US nuclear umbrella for security and now the US has clearly threatened rescission I don't see how a responsible state doesn't start hedging their bets, permanently.
Not overnight, but long term.
comment in response to
post
Maybe the Taliban can have them in another great American surplus giveaway.
comment in response to
post
BigBalls got BigBills
comment in response to
post
If you haven't mastered those core competencies you're not gonna be able to explain them accurately to an AI, so your productivity will still suck.
comment in response to
post
Definitely seen at bigger firms.
Acts a meeting summarization tool that no one reads.
If you know languages, concepts, and paradigms, zero efficiency in trying to massage a tool to randomly spit out what you can craft in your head and express immediately, even without a modern IDE.
comment in response to
post
I suggest they propose legislation to put real teeth into breaching the existing personnel laws, including personal risk of incarceration to terminating parties if found illegal.
comment in response to
post
First, this is confusing two issues as firings are not the same as the buyout.
The buyout proposed a legally suspect 8 month severance.
The firings, also legally suspect, propose nothing.
Is the Dems responsibility to lessen the blow or fight the illegality?
The latter.
comment in response to
post
The blind loyalty test validates the theory that upper mgmt at the Boer's companies have always been filled with quislings.
comment in response to
post
Every tool?
comment in response to
post
Assuming we've crossed the mental rubicon for justifying nuclear proliferation (who's gonna trust the US umbrella now), where do you speculate we go (let's good faith assume this admin is wild aberration, and we actually return to defending democracy) in terms of force policy?
comment in response to
post
Too busy tracking the list of future federal inmates.
Turns out we're gonna need more compute resources.
comment in response to
post
Considering he ran from SA right before they gave the vote to Africans, the real ones.
comment in response to
post
Gotta make fraud to find fraud.
comment in response to
post
Techbro bailed on his Boer buds the minute they threatened to give Africans the vote.