Profile avatar
purva.bsky.social
Quantum Open Source
69 posts 269 followers 710 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
Of course you would call these Self Correcting Time Crystals, which would also allow you to start a side business in Santa Fe NM peddling woo.
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
What does the line in red say in French? My Duolingo French interprets the one in black as 'This is not a quantum computer'. Then the second one starts with 'But it....' and ends with something about 'value'.
comment in response to post
Schrodinger's Killer App by Dowling is also a nice read. His personal anecdotes in the book are hilarious.
comment in response to post
In a different world, she could have had a long and illustrious career as a particle physicist. To know more about her, read this excellent interview: ias.edu/ideas/redisc...
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
what's BLS?
comment in response to post
Not Dulwich. But my favorite incorrect clichΓ© is 'Quantum computers do multiple calculations at once.'
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
Happy Birthday!
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
NOT to be confused with Carl Neumann, of boundary condition fame, as explained in this letter to the American Journal of Physics by @aklotz.bsky.social.
comment in response to post
I did not know about this series. Thanks! Since ants have a hive-like mentality, reading about computers based on ant colonies would be interesting.
comment in response to post
β€œWhy wouldn’t you want an AI to summarize your work while adding numerous errors, sucking out any meaning or subtly, but keeping an artificial veneer of complete confidence? It’s like you don’t even want your job replaced by something worse and far less useful?”
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
πŸ“Œ