tresson.bsky.social
36 posts
95 followers
99 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And hoopla
comment in response to
post
And use free library apps like libby and hoopla.
comment in response to
post
Con artists exist in everything. Also, she's not doctor. She apparently dropped and Forbes later retracted after she was exposed as a fraud. There's actually an audio book i listened to that talks about this. Quackery
A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything.
comment in response to
post
But, which one's? Is it legitimate, based on correlation, or is it unintentional conformation bias? One of these things affected how you understand things in medicine.
comment in response to
post
Then why you against something we've used since 1796?
comment in response to
post
So, you actually care about evidence, you just wanna be right. Much like flat earthers. Who also have no evidence to back up their claim. Also, why would an animal care and what relevance is that statement to the obviously one sided conversation?
comment in response to
post
Just did a Google search. Saw no evidence that what you said is true. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
comment in response to
post
You should still get vaccinated. So, you don't get sick and/or die.
comment in response to
post
What do you mean
comment in response to
post
Watch out for counter strike!
comment in response to
post
There are, though sometimes rare, cases of people who are not related to look and sound the same. Someone right now could have a twin and not know it. So, yes. Nancy can have a twin somewhere in her family who is not a sibling to her.
comment in response to
post
No... that actually involves effort. The horror one coming out just makes Popeye a lazy monster.
comment in response to
post
There already is one coming out. It looks bad.
comment in response to
post
With this version. Same rules as with steamboat wllie.
comment in response to
post
Are they really banned if you can easily buy them on Amazon?
comment in response to
post
I have to say, unless you have information to back up your claim, this false information, which took two seconds to Google, you're no better then the awful monsters at peta. www.politifact.com/article/2021...
comment in response to
post
I mean, if you make infinity predictions, you'll eventually get... one right. Also, context is important for this gag. Like how people say they predicted his presidency. When he was elected long ago and lost back then. So, no. They didn't predict anything. Just got lucked into being right.
comment in response to
post
They didn't become obsolete. Just changed with the times.
comment in response to
post
I'm sure it has. But, it's a serial comic. Plot like that is not normally important and has probably only been explained from the start or only once for a gag.
comment in response to
post
Also, businesses are this. But, you can enforce your policies and not be a pos while you're at it. Twitter n Facebook just don't seem to care.
comment in response to
post
He jump good =3
comment in response to
post
Only by those that choose religion to manipulate. And those hypocrites should be called out on. Jesus and buddha taught be kind. Not hate.
comment in response to
post
Which is weird cause Jesus taught not to be that. Even in the modern sense. They seem to want to be the victim all the time. Even in America. Which freedom of religion law.
comment in response to
post
Does it? I've been reading Buddhism. And buddha says to be kind and considerate. In his teachings, he even encourages not just the questioning of others but his own as well. Are their people who misuse it? Of course. But, he taught to be not suffer or cause other's to suffer.
comment in response to
post
To give a haircut? You know they can do that, right?
comment in response to
post
Or even farther back, dickie Goodman. He used music samples to make fake interviews. His most well known is Mr jaws. He went to court over it. According to Wikipedia, the court eventually ruled his sampled mix was considered a parody and thus an entirely new work.
comment in response to
post
I mean... how? They fall under the First Amendment.
comment in response to
post
Which one's do you mean?
comment in response to
post
Why can't both win? Both are legitimate forms of reading.
comment in response to
post
Maybe