seckels.bsky.social
I live in Wisconsin. He/him/his
78 posts
13 followers
14 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I think he's doing laundry (he's at least putting it away). The rest I agree.
comment in response to
post
He's so young looking that he got carded last year where the guideline is to card people under 40. So young!
comment in response to
post
You seem to be engaging with a suggestion that no one made. Adding a step (which may have negative outcomes that make it not feasible or wise for other reasons) would not be this expensive rebuild you're imagining.
comment in response to
post
If you'd like to appear to be something other than a contrarian I recommend not nearly simultaneously advancing contradictory arguments.
If you're appealing to 1899 priorities, disability access wasn't even on the list.
bsky.app/profile/z00k...
comment in response to
post
I like when the guy on the ferry complains about how he can't park where he wants to. Legitimately a great touch.
comment in response to
post
Parenthesis/brackets I'm fine with, but quotation marks auto populating is the worst.
comment in response to
post
Definitely what I imagine from a major city. Nailed it, East Coast!
comment in response to
post
Except "how she feels love" is a heck of a thing to try to paper over for compatibility.
comment in response to
post
Not that you need it or are surprised, but I'll say from personal experience that not literally every guy has had this experience. I understand it's hard to be a perpetual victim like that guy, though.
comment in response to
post
The conversation that kicked this off was about banning them from planes. Banning them from important infrastructure is a big step toward banning them from public.
comment in response to
post
To be fair, Obama is the only POTUS we have had who was born in a later year than Trump.
comment in response to
post
He needs to recognize that when he used her son as a scapegoat he also outsourced whether it was OK.
comment in response to
post
Emoluments Clause too, right?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Also...didn't they notably not all get deported?
comment in response to
post
There's a figure somewhere that says a very small amount of fentanyl can be lethal. Take the amount seized times that and you have an absurd lives saved figure.
comment in response to
post
If that should be mandatory it could be baked into the price of the child's seat. I'm fine with expecting parents to request it, but upcharging for it is foolish and begging people to call the airline's bluff.
Don't charge extra to do the right thing.
comment in response to
post
Do you think it's better for everyone involved if she's sitting next to her kids?
I do. So the airline shouldn't charge for the privilege.
comment in response to
post
I have it on good authority that it is "yumm."
comment in response to
post
We're sorry. We needed a brief reprieve from him. I'm surprised he was allowed in the country given his record.
comment in response to
post
Confident but incorrect.
www.specialolympics.org/stories/impa...
comment in response to
post
It's sad how they feel a need to lie to give their guy more authority. He got a plurality on his third try, never a majority. Unlike all other presidents of this century.
comment in response to
post
I haven't heard about them deporting adopted kids, but they have deported/trafficked a toddler who was born here.
comment in response to
post
I feel like they're giving away the game by naming it after the magic that is great until the wrong hands get any piece of it when it becomes nightmarish. What an apt warning the company gives about itself.
comment in response to
post
If he thinks your posts imply these are the norm he needs to get a little more perspective.
comment in response to
post
I read that as man cave or something like that. Maybe in a warm climate it could even be in a shed.
comment in response to
post
I assume some online multiplayer game. WoW, Destiny Fortnite, etc.
comment in response to
post
If its responses are shaped to look like a human's I'll treat it civilly. Not for its benefit, but for mine. I don't want to get in a habit that will lead to me treating actual people at call centers and such as less than human.
comment in response to
post
Very bad but necessary to meet the times.
comment in response to
post
No, even if you have significant qualms with surrogacy, a consensual contract is not sexual slavery.
I have noticed most concerns with surrogacy tend to target adoption, too.
comment in response to
post
We need the test case for litigation and public opinion. If they can't even bring this person home after they acknowledged sending him was a mistake by their standards that should be a clear line for everyone.
It's depressing that it isn't.
comment in response to
post
There's some supply chain resiliency that would be beneficial to America in general. We need to make sure the workers have ample protections, both legal and safety.
comment in response to
post
I was all ready to agree with her at the end of the first sentence. Things with meaningful assembly needs should ship with instructions.
But the rest...no.
comment in response to
post
I view it as 75% don't qualify for the overseas concentration camp based on the standards Trump and Bukele set. Bukele announced it was only for convicted criminals.
It may be an angle to demonstrate they're lying to their less diehard supporters.
comment in response to
post
Don't worry, it's on the blockchain.
comment in response to
post
Sure, in the same sense that my Kirkland Signature facial tissues factually aren't Kleenex but I don't feel incorrect calling them that.
The most important feature of rubberducking is that the reflection comes from the speaker.
Incidentally, your relevant feature is true of an LLM.
comment in response to
post
I have generally used the term for doing the same concept with a colleague who isn't providing relevant commentary.
I agree with your feelings about how most use LLMs but I'm far less absolutist about the term.
comment in response to
post
With respect, they aren't saying they can't do anything. They're saying the judge can't do anything. They definitely won't be limiting their own ostensible power that way.
comment in response to
post
You have funny criteria for "crushed."
comment in response to
post
What I read claimed it was outside the power of the court, not outside the power of the US government. An argument that the law ends at the border even if we're paying someone to do something overseas.
comment in response to
post
I'm a man who routinely still wears masks. I think it would be a lot harder if I were a woman since even relatively unfit guys don't draw harassment.
comment in response to
post
Sleep when the baby sleeps.
comment in response to
post
Yep! I joined a company around 3 years into a 5 year platform migration. Just over a decade later and it was mostly done.
That's not to say the migration isn't worth the effort. But unless it's OK to have a bunch of inscrutable bugs they're not going to be able to hurry it up that much with LLMs.
comment in response to
post
You're doomed, man.
comment in response to
post
Those pandas are clearly spreading CCP propaganda. Not on Trump's watch!
comment in response to
post
Don't let him drag you down. He's just a little salty about it!
comment in response to
post
To unabashedly be "that guy," Cookie would absolutely leave many crumbs. He would not leave a nearly intact cookie, though.
comment in response to
post
"Appropriate credentials" was not a requirement for these positions.
comment in response to
post
I assume they cross reference them with our publicly available voter registration information.