Here's an example of a news org framing things in a misleading way. The article very precisely notes she lost 4083 followers but does not mention that her accounts have 5.6 MILLION followers combined. She's lost 0.073% of her following. I think she'll be fine. https://www.newsweek.com/alex-cooper-followers-after-harris-interview-1965739
Comments
prior human intelligence soon cuz present day human intelligence seems shot.
So she went with the weakest possible criticism of Harris
Maybe wait a bit before trying to dunk?
Orgs that used to be at least a little reliable have been bought and corrupted.
Politifact, CNN, and so many more.
now I'm thinking of whatever philosophy pop culture channel I was watching like nine hours ago where they talked about wossface's boat, "is it the same boat if all the parts were replaced." something about vampire's souls on Buffy. I think the Tin Man in Oz had that plotline.
in hindsight: magical.
Sounds like Harris is more of a trend setter than anything! 🤷♂️
magazine ceased publication a little over a decade ago. It's currently owned by Dev Pragad and Johnathan Davis, fwiw.
Something which I imagine happens all the time.
When a thing is very large and you want to sensationalize a small % of it, use an absolute number (e.g. 438 murders in NYC 2022.)