HUGE: The Supreme Court sides with Richard Glossip, holding that prosecutors violated his constitutional rights by failing to correct false testimony at his trial. It directs the Oklahoma courts to vacate his conviction! https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/22-7466_5h25.pdf
Comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Glossip
He actually did not have to recuse from | Glossip v Oklahoma 2024 | but it is the right thing to do. 🐇
GD prosecutors should fulfill the rest of Glossip’s sentence.
And nothing's going to happen to the cops and the prosecutor.
Someone may write a very sternly worded letter! Very sternly worded indeed!
I've read about this case, and am still unaware of what his supposed motive was in ordering sneed to kill that man
sneeds testimony is the only thing that convicted him
that falls far short of the evidentiary bar for a conviction
overall, too, the money paid him is small change for the people paying it
alito, now, he's psychopathically evil through and through
This is really big news. Glossip's trial was so unfair that even Oklahoma's attorney general wanted a new one.
And no one stood up and demanded his psychiatrist come to testify (and also lose their medical license)?
Then again, they probably don't.
They at least are masks off at the concept that this court is apolitical