At least fifty people have replied to this with "what positives?"
Yes, that's the joke. The giveaway was where I said "the total lack of positives." I was saying there were none.
Yes, that's the joke. The giveaway was where I said "the total lack of positives." I was saying there were none.
Reposted from
Kevin M. Kruse
Yes, there are lots of negatives around the Pete Hegseth nomination -- the rampant alcoholism, the allegations of sexual assault, the hush money payment to an accuser, the total incompetence leading non-profits, and so on.
But ask yourself:
Does all that outweigh the total lack of positives?
But ask yourself:
Does all that outweigh the total lack of positives?
Comments
And here you are disproving that rule.
Not helping, not helpful at all.
Wait, is this a multiverse time travel thing? Because I haven't had coffee yet.
Your sentence is 10 more years of social media.
Keep it coming, though. Many of us are right there with you!
(There is still an oath, right?)
Not saying it’s anyone’s job, but it’s the only road out of hell that I can see.
(also sadly, this does sometimes apply to me as well.)