That "intellectual diversity" and "free speech" were trojan horses for right-wing power-grabs has been obvious from the start and I remain disappointed how many supposedly rational folks took bad-faith actors at their word.
Reposted from
Grant Hayden
“Intellectual diversity is essentially a fake problem that is used to create cover for ideologically committed, far-right faculty who are not intellectually honest.” Craig Campbell, UT anthropology professor.
www.austinchronicle.com/news/2024-11...
www.austinchronicle.com/news/2024-11...
Comments
But in a church setting, it's one person talking. Everyone else has to just sit there and listen.
Obvious flaws, there, but...
Free speech is the whine from people who are angry they can't write a coherent comment or defend their opinions.
With that you could just find and replace "segregation"
You're out-doing Portland... again.
Like, in what world is that a thing?
They’re immune to facts and evidence and decency and I want nothing to do with them.
I’ve seen them on both sides…we all have. Being irrational isn’t a +
But folks also might just ideologically agree.
Statistical tautology
Dead on the money 💰
Lots of editorials claiming to be the voice of moderation while espousing anything but.
Morality can be paid off for far too many people. Especially in the US where Capital is King.