If the legitimate press just permanently stopped attending these events and were replaced by propaganda outlets, that would be both optically clarifying and improve actual journalism.
Reposted from
Brian Stelter
Consider the possibility that the Trump White House WANTS this fight. Wants journalists to act like opponents instead of observers. If the entire press pool skipped a Trump photo op in solidarity with The AP, wouldn't the White House welcome Breitbart and One America News to take their places?
Comments
Nothing Trump would love more that a room full of these folks asking the 'right' questions.
Stone: being deaf, I couldn't attend the briefing (no ASL translators back then) so I had to read the report
Worse, they reflexively cave on preferred nomenclature.
Today, the outlets regarding agree to say “Gulf of America” to maintain access.
Tomorrow, it’ll be “Red White and Blueland” instead of Greenland.
Spot on about the bigotry:
"the acronym LGBTQ+ has been shortened to LGB"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglywwn29n6o
[you likely already know about this news item—sharing for the broader public]
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf
Very smart. Yes.
You must make a lot of money with these ideas.
https://howardsbend.com
Why they aren’t standing w/AP is just incredibly short sighted.
To Russia.
https://www.thewrap.com/pentagon-removes-media-nbc-news-nyt-other-media-rotation-program/
I can't believe they don't see that is the actual power that they have. Trump NEEDS their attention. They have him by the balls if they just walk out!
Sure he likes Breitbart and whatever but that doesn't give him the same vindication that the Wall Street Journal does.