Make no mistake:
In all but nullifying nationwide, “universal” injunctions in these cases, where a uniform rule of law for birthright citizenship is gravely needed, the Supreme Court chose chaos.
Yes, the right still exists. But a lot of needless confusion, fear, and litigation lie ahead.
In all but nullifying nationwide, “universal” injunctions in these cases, where a uniform rule of law for birthright citizenship is gravely needed, the Supreme Court chose chaos.
Yes, the right still exists. But a lot of needless confusion, fear, and litigation lie ahead.
Reposted from
Mike Sacks
Justice Barrett writes for the right-wing supermajority reining in nationwide injunctions and letting Trump unconstitutionally end birthright citizenship in areas of the country where judges have not yet blocked Trump's citizenship-stripping executive order. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
Comments
The Republican justices studiously avoid talking about the illegality of ending birthright citizenship because it's indefensible.
202 224 3121 is the US Congressional Switchboard
https://resist.bot/petitions/PHWHYJ
They had no problems with nationwide injunctions when it came to Biden's, but NOW "they must be stopped!"
In this country, as in any other developed country, small-L liberal politics and legal recourse are the only peaceful means of resolving disputes. Many people may end up seeing violence as a viable solution.