Hillel enforces an ideological position regarding the state of Israel on its members. It pushes people out who do things like screen Palestinian documentaries or collaborate with J Street, a liberal group that advocates for a two-state solution. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/us/members-of-jewish-student-group-test-permissible-discussion-on-israel.html?unlocked_article_code=1.pU0.jvtW.D27Bftn4yJKp&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb 🎁
Comments
Students should be responsible for student groups not the administration board.
When the administration group pushes for a group to be on campus that is infringing on student self-governance.
Is the reference to "the region" meant to imply that secular, pluralistic states are somehow beyond them?
It's anti-Jewishness in target, rationale, and felt impact is what makes it per se antisemitic.
My point, as somebody concerned about the future of Jewish life in America, is that Hillel's biggest threat is Hillel.