So there happens to be a Supreme Court case that addresses whether and how federal funds can be used to indirectly regulate policy in the states. Among other things, the goal must be related to the original purpose of the funds and it cannot be unduly coercive.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk
Comments
I cant shake the idea of the Patel Stasi Guard
There is no rule of law any more.
We have to stop pretending that any of that matters. Because it doesn't.
He's beating Hitler's record, and our hands are tied.
The SC has no enforcement power and an even weaker spinal degeneration problem.
Who will hold them responsible?
bye bye Department of Education!
perhaps you should go back to school and learn it…
Yes, Pepperidge Farm remembers
The questions should be about WHO will stop him and HOW he can be stopped.
Just note this current admin stay from Roberts has already lasted 6 days, so they must be hammering a swing voter. Means there are already 4 votes to overturnprecedent.
This time your democracy is going down the drain.
You had your chance since 1865 and you never got rid of them and they're too strong now.
law is now vibes.
Dear Leader pardoned those cretins.
It is a long standing strategy of Trump's, since before he entered politics, to string people on with litigation that is spun out via spurious objections.
Agitate away.
If he tries to enforce all of this it will backfire.
Just like almost everything today.