When you removed populations from the category of human rights, are you removing them from the category of human?
Reposted from
Michael Kagan
The annual State Department human rights report “will remove all sections covering the rights of women, LGBTQ+ people, and the disabled as well as sections dedicated to discrimination against indigenous people and corruption in government.”
www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/03/marc...
www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/03/marc...
Comments
That's what they're trying to do, but we must say that they can't.
The theory must be that they don't matter/don't really exist
As per "fascism is first and foremost an attack on reality"
Which logically means it's our job to prove them wrong.
Marco:
.... Yyyyes sir!
They didn't come this far, reaching their nirvanna of November 2024, to suddenly follow the laws of free & fair elections.
There is no authoritarian govt in the world that loses to their mock elections.
Ask Alexei Navalny..
oh wait..~🕊
And since these ghouls excluded "women" from their definition of "human," I cordially invite them to try propagating the species without us by fucking themselves.
No names.
Nazi shit.
https://katemanne.substack.com/p/is-seeing-women-as-human-really-the
I’m down for that.
‘Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.’ [HuffPost]
#BanTheBillionaires
(If they had one on the first place)
Yrs ago, Pete Thiel stated 'Women should not even be allowed to vote."
You know where Marco's headed on this issue. Right?