erpel.bsky.social
phd student working on bayesian methods in bioimage analysis; @fz-juelich.de, @hds_lee & @lmu-muenchen.bsky.social; bsc+msc in comp sci @univie.ac.at; based in karlsruhe; ripaul.github.io
45 posts
652 followers
570 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
aber 100-jahre alte bäume dafür gefällt :( und was soll überhaupt die zweie spur zwischen uni und radstreifen?
comment in response to
post
having lived there for 9 yrs, I'd challenge you on that one! though it does look delicious
comment in response to
post
ew and to top it off, the free adobe version doesn’t let me digitally sign docs? 🤢🫠😭😵💫
comment in response to
post
hi, would love to be added as well :)
comment in response to
post
haha, like you made it improper by accident and realized it has cool properties?
comment in response to
post
oh, I see. well, cool paper nevertheless
comment in response to
post
@lucamb.bsky.social posted a very nice paper on improper GPs the other day, guess he should be in there too :)
comment in response to
post
hehe, found it: bsky.app/profile/drsc...
comment in response to
post
I saw some kind of hack the other day which allowed you to basically bookmark using those customized feeds I believe? I‘d have to search for it.. Apart from that you may just like those, but it’s clearly not optimal
comment in response to
post
wild dreams
comment in response to
post
I think in Germany the costs per year of a PhD student are estimated at about 100k€, which makes 25k PhD years, so something about 6000 PhD positions if you give them a 4-yrs contract. actually less than what I would have guessed
comment in response to
post
and quite in contrary, if it wasn't about the aftertaste of trying to inflate paper counts, then I guess such only-blogpost-worthy papers are actually super nice, because in the end they're still just about making some kind of knowledge or insight a bit more persistent
comment in response to
post
isn't a blog post to some extent just the modern version of a paper? personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with short papers and that any aversion against them stems mainly from the whole overvaluing of paper and citations counts
comment in response to
post
I'm curious to see though how often it will be used and just generally if/how those who submitted perceive any change/improvement in review quality
comment in response to
post
I guess it still makes sense then to have you on screen :)
comment in response to
post
do you point on the slides? if so, I think appearing as in the screenshot is nice, otherwise maybe a bit smaller?
comment in response to
post
you‘re added to my mental list of candidates for a "Junior Researchers in ML+AI" which I will turn into a starter pack once my list grows to at least 6 ppl haha, that‘s the minimum required. so if you know any other ppl here who should be added, pls link them :)
comment in response to
post
we should really make a starter pack for junior ml researchers! but you need to have at least 6 such junior researchers to step sich a list, including @elnaza.bsky.social (if you want) we‘d be only 3 so far, you know any other here who might be interested?
comment in response to
post
@kityates.bsky.social has two nice starter packs for sci comm :)
comment in response to
post
Yeah, true, nevertheless a fair point. But again, I'd say the starter packs can and do actually help the migration, one just needs to be daring enough to ask to be included, I guess
comment in response to
post
Oh, yeah, that's true. When I first got a Twitter to engage in the community I was also very intimidated. But I think being somewhat persistent about liking+commenting stuff and that getting an occasional reaction does break the ice, to the point that it becomes a nice way to randomly approach ppl
comment in response to
post
I was actually just thinking about doing this... though here in Germany it's actually 1am and I just be going to bed, lol
comment in response to
post
I don't necessarily agree that it's intimidating, but I do agree that the bias towards known seniors is frustrating as a junior. I post stuff, nobody replies, it sucks. But if you just ask about being part in the starter packs, you may at least get a good follower base. At least it worked for me
comment in response to
post
I get the frustration, but being "a junior" myself, I do actually agree with those seniors that everything being "fresh" does help. And it's just exactly the starter packs. You just need to ask to be included there :) And so far I didn't have the impression of ppl gatekeeping those starter packs
comment in response to
post
yeah, I definitely agree
comment in response to
post
CVPR implemented a "irresponsible reviewer" policy this year which will result in desk rejects of the reviewer‘s submissions.. guess that’s a step? will be interesting to see how that turns out
comment in response to
post
my learnings from this is - everytime - that I should learn to start with experiments and results rather than writing, but maybe I just dislike coding more than I‘d wish to admit
comment in response to
post
hi there, I'd love to join, too :)
comment in response to
post
well done baiting me to check out your account
comment in response to
post
I'd be quite grumpy, if you don't add me 😤
comment in response to
post
yeah, true. well, it's not a key aspect, and was rather bugging me in my strive for comprehensiveness, so I'd be happy to just mention the possible connection. thank you! :)
comment in response to
post
huh, yeah, that was what I was wondering! whether I can write "well, material was missing, so we won't continue here"
comment in response to
post
guess I should just mail them, but afaik they're not mathematicians and I don't know how happy they'd be to share unpublished work... 😅
comment in response to
post
yeah, I think it's definitely the case, that our views and approaches kinda nicely complement each other and I'd like to actively integrate their work in ours, too, but again since it's a preprint w missing supplement & proofs, I feel like making e.g. a theoretical connection is kinda hard...
comment in response to
post
hi vincent! I‘d love to join, too :)